RFK’s new panel of vaccine experts at CDC are a bunch of anti vax conspiracy theorists.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes30%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 242 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It was a joy to join Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. – Alpha Leadership Academy. This program equips collegiate young men to lead with purpose, integrity, and service.
I encouraged them to have a voice in national affairs.
They made me hopeful for our future.
It was a joy to join Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. – Alpha Leadership Academy. This program equips collegiate young men to lead with purpose, integrity, and service.
I encouraged them to have a voice in national affairs.
They made me hopeful for our future.
None of this is happening in a vacuum.
Firing 17 vaccine experts.
Lying about scientific studies.
Cutting funds for vaccine research.
RFK is pushing an anti-vaccine agenda onto the American people. This will cost lives. www.notus.org/health-scien...
The constant lies
The $15 million in cancer funding cut
The $9.5 billion in NIH grants terminated
The 20,000 jobs eliminated
The quackery
The conspiracy theories
I don’t know where to start on why RFK MUST RESIGN.
I stand with the brave NIH workers who continue to advocate for science and research in the face of this backwards-thinking Administration. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/h...
I was honored to speak at Duke University’s Executive Master of Public Affairs reception.
My time at Duke ignited a passion for service and love of public policy. And it was at Duke where I started to hear the call to serve.
I hope the students I spoke with hear that call too.
In Western Maryland:
1 in 7 adults relies on Medicaid.
1 in 3 children relies on the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Republicans want to cut these lifesaving programs to pay for billionaire tax cuts. It's disgraceful. www.baltimoresun.com/2025/06/09/r...
I visited Marylanders at Collington senior community.
Nearly every one of them told me how this Republican scam of a bill would hurt them.
Kicking Marylanders off their health care is utterly callous.
I'll always fight to protect Medicare and Medicaid.
Grateful to Luminis Health, Employ Prince George’s, and all our partners for co-hosting a job and resource fair for Marylanders who have been impacted by layoffs and those seeking new opportunities.
We had employers from across MD. During this time, we need to come together.
Eid Mubarak to everyone in Maryland and across the globe!
I wish you peace, joy, and many blessings as you gather today with your families and loved ones.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia should not have been deported. Even the Supreme Court demanded this President follow the law and return him to the U.S. It is right that due process will be afforded to him.
Local food is medicine. Spice Creek Farm does incredible work delivering local produce to our communities.
While farmers are suffering under this Administration - the threat of tariffs, cuts to USDA, and rising prices, I will keep fighting for our farmers and bring down costs.
It was Field Day at Tulip Grove Elementary!
I had so much fun today with the students before they are off to enjoy the summer.
I will keep on fighting for our public schools and ensuring all Maryland students have access to quality education.
I joined the National Association of Women Business Owners for their 50th Anniversary Advocacy Luncheon.
Creating economic opportunity is my north star. I'm pursuing policies that expand access to capital so businesses – like the ones run by the women in this room – can grow.
Reposted bySenator Angela Alsobrooks
Jesus came to preach good news to the poor. Policies that are bad news for the poor are the opposite of the gospel message.
I want to thank the emergency crews from the various Maryland agencies and US Coast Guard for their work to contain the oil spill at Harbor East.
My office will continue to touch base with the Governor’s and Mayor’s teams.
There's a reason Republicans refused to pass my Tariff Transparency Act.
The CBO proved it when it concluded that these foolish tariffs would drive inflation up and shrink our economy.
Working class people always pay the price for this Administration's economic insanity.
Senate Republicans want to rubber stamp Trump’s callous plan to make the largest cut to SNAP in history.
129K Marylanders are at risk of losing SNAP benefits.
Paying for tax cuts for billionaires on the backs of hungry children is shameful.
Glad to meet with my friend Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, today.
And I’m proud to be in this together, fighting for a future where women across the country have the freedom to access abortion and reproductive health care.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-08 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.