H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

Environmental Protection|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresAir quality
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 2, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageLaw

Became Public Law No: 119-17.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This joint resolution, enacted under the Congressional Review Act, disapproves and nullifies an EPA rule that granted California a waiver to implement its Low NOx motor vehicle, engine, and nonroad engine pollution standards (90 Fed.

Reg. 643, Jan 6, 2025).

The resolution declares that the EPA rule "shall have no force or effect." It removes the specific waiver decision and prevents that rule from taking effect absent new statutory or administrative action.

Passage30/100

Narrow and administratively simple but ideologically charged and affecting state authority; success depends on chamber votes and executive approval.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that precisely identifies the targeted EPA rule and declares it to have no force or effect. It performs the core statutory function with clear specificity but provides minimal supplementary material.

Contention72/100

Environmental/health benefits of California's rule vs regulatory burden concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
States · ManufacturersStates
Likely helped
  • StatesCreates uniform national vehicle and engine standards, avoiding state-by-state regulatory divergence.
  • ManufacturersReduces compliance costs for manufacturers selling nationwide, lowering production complexity and administrative burden…
  • StatesProtects jobs in manufacturing and distribution by preventing new state-specific equipment modifications.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould increase NOx emissions compared with California's stricter standards, worsening air quality.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay cause negative public health outcomes, especially respiratory harms in exposed communities.
  • StatesUndermines California's established waiver authority under the Clean Air Act, reducing state regulatory flexibility.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Environmental/health benefits of California's rule vs regulatory burden concerns
Progressive15%

Likely strongly opposed.

They would view the resolution as blocking stronger air pollution controls and undermining state authority to protect public health.

They would see it as setting a negative precedent restricting EPA and state climate and air quality leadership.

Likely resistant
Centrist45%

Mixed/conditional.

Appreciates concerns about regulatory fragmentation and manufacturer burdens, but worries about environmental and public health impacts.

Would favor a compromise: national standards that achieve emissions goals while minimizing inconsistent state rules.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive.

Views the resolution as restoring regulatory uniformity, protecting manufacturers from state-specific mandates, and restraining EPA expansion.

Sees blocking the waiver as sensible to avoid burdensome California-imposed rules on other states and industry.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Law

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow and administratively simple but ideologically charged and affecting state authority; success depends on chamber votes and executive approval.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Executive branch willingness to sign or veto
  • Senate procedural path and cloture prospects
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Environmental/health benefits of California's rule vs regulatory burden concerns

Narrow and administratively simple but ideologically charged and affecting state authority; success depends on chamber votes and executive…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that precisely identifies the targeted EPA rule and declares it to have no force or effect. It performs t…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis