H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Emission Airport Shuttle; Zero-Emission Power Train Certification; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

Environmental Protection|Air qualityCalifornia
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 2, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageLaw

Became Public Law No: 119-15.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This joint resolution under the Congressional Review Act disapproves and nullifies an Environmental Protection Agency rule (88 Fed.

Reg. 20688, April 6, 2023) concerning EPA’s decision to grant California waivers and related approvals for heavy-duty vehicle and engine standards and related zero-emission provisions.

As enacted, the resolution states the specified EPA rule "shall have no force or effect," effectively reversing the EPA notice of decision regarding California’s motor vehicle and engine pollution control standards and related items.

Passage35/100

Narrow, low-cost measure but highly polarizing and removes state regulatory authority; outcome hinges on chamber majorities and executive response.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that clearly identifies the targeted EPA rule and states the operative effect (no force or effect). It appropriately relies on the underlying CRA statutory mechanism, resulting in minimal but sufficient drafting for a single-rule disapproval.

Contention78/100

Climate vs. regulatory burden: liberals stress emissions, conservatives stress costs.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agencies · ManufacturersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesMaintains a single, nationwide federal standard instead of differing state rules for vehicle emissions.
  • ManufacturersReduces near‑term compliance complexity and regulatory differences faced by vehicle manufacturers.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLowers potential immediate compliance costs for fleets that would meet California's stricter requirements.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersUndermines California's longstanding authority to set stricter vehicle emissions standards under the Clean Air Act.
  • Targeted stakeholdersDelays or reduces anticipated emissions and greenhouse gas reductions that California's standards would achieve.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould slow market adoption and infrastructure deployment for zero‑emission trucks, shuttles, and powertrains.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Climate vs. regulatory burden: liberals stress emissions, conservatives stress costs.
Progressive15%

Likely views the resolution negatively as a rollback of state ability to adopt stronger clean-vehicle standards.

Sees it as undermining emissions reductions, climate goals, and environmental justice, and as emboldening federal interference in state environmental policy.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view: appreciates congressional oversight and desire for regulatory clarity, but worries about the environmental and political effects of nullifying waivers.

Seeks a pragmatic tradeoff between predictable national rules and ambitious emissions reductions.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supports the resolution as a check on EPA and as protection against California-imposed de facto national standards.

Views nullification as reducing regulatory burden and protecting interstate commerce and manufacturers from a patchwork of state rules.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Law

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Passage likelihood35/100

Narrow, low-cost measure but highly polarizing and removes state regulatory authority; outcome hinges on chamber majorities and executive response.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Which congressional majority would support disapproval
  • Executive branch signature or veto inclination
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Climate vs. regulatory burden: liberals stress emissions, conservatives stress costs.

Narrow, low-cost measure but highly polarizing and removes state regulatory authority; outcome hinges on chamber majorities and executive r…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution that clearly identifies the targeted EPA rule and states the operative effect (no force or effect). It ap…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis