While the top 0.1% get their tax cuts, Republicans’ bill will shutter our hospitals, increase drive and wait times for everyone, and strain our already overworked doctors and nurses.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin
Tammy Baldwin
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 321 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Last night, Republicans gutted funding for our local public TV and radio – something that folks in Wisconsin, especially in our rural communities, rely on in cases of emergencies like floods, storms, and AMBER Alerts.
And why? Because Donald Trump told them to.
Elon Musk’s DOGE should not have access to Wisconsin farmers’ sensitive financial data. Allowing DOGE staffers to alter or cancel payments and loans with little oversight would be a blow to our farmers’ privacy and jeopardize their livelihoods.
www.npr.org/2025/07/15/n...
I can’t believe I have to say this but shutting down the Department of Education is a bad idea. Wisconsin teachers, parents, and kids are going to pay the price for this. apnews.com/article/trum...
Farmers’ suicide rate is 3.5x higher than everyone else, and we have to treat it like the crisis it is. Proud to partner with Senator Ernst to put lifesaving support within reach for rural Wisconsinites. Let’s pass it.
While big corporations celebrate their big tax breaks from Trump’s budget bill, Americans will see rural hospitals close, grandparents on Medicaid lose health care coverage, and hungry kids denied food assistance.
Thanks to the Republicans’ devastating budget bill, Wisconsinites will feel the pain of local hospitals potentially closing, longer wait times to get an appointment, and higher health care costs. civicmedia.us/news/2025/07...
From changing water levels to dangerous contaminants, our Great Lakes and the communities that rely on them are facing challenges. It was great to see how our partnership between the federal government and Wisconsinites is helping our most precious resource stay protected for generations to come.
Donald Trump and Republicans’ budget bill will close hospitals across this country. Period.
I‘m here at Bellin Hospital in Green Bay to shine a light on just how bad this will be for Wisconsin families.
Trump claims he wants to help our farmers and small businesses, but his reckless and completely unnecessary trade war is crushing them.
urbanmilwaukee.com/2025/06/30/b...
When thousands of Wisconsinites get kicked off their Medicaid, remember who did that: Republicans. www.wpr.org/health/tens-...
Donald Trump’s and the Republicans’ budget bill puts Wisconsin rural communities last when it comes to being able to access affordable health care.
www.htrnews.com/story/news/h...
Folks, having a guy who undermines safe vaccines and pushes wild conspiracy theories leading our nation's biggest health agency is bad news for Americans' health. www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...
Cuts to Medicaid and kicking millions off their health care, taking food assistance from families and jacking up grocery costs, and reckless tariffs – it all just shows President Trump doesn’t get it.
Families want lower costs and to be able to save for the future – not this.
Wisconsinites living in rural areas already face scarce health care options.
Unfortunately, Donald Trump and Republicans’ newly passed bill will make our rural health care crisis so much worse. www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...
Good.
Republicans are trying to cobble together a backdoor national abortion ban, and defunding Planned Parenthood is a key part of it.
The fight to protect women's right to control their bodies and futures continues.
Milwaukee didn’t just “lose” the money.
We had it ripped away by President Trump and Congressional Republicans so they could pay for absurd tax breaks for their wealthy friends and big corporations.
All of Wisconsin’s Republican members of Congress voted to terminate 250,000 Wisconsinites' health care and threaten to close our rural hospitals.
Thankfully, we have @GovEvers, who is helping avert some of the worst of it and has working families’ backs.
Remember that it was Republicans in Congress who decided to kick 17 million Americans off their health care.
That’s like taking away health care coverage from the entire populations of Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa COMBINED.
The Fourth of July marks the day America declared itself an independent country that is ruled by no king.
Today, we celebrate our freedom and liberty.
I hope everyone has a fun and safe Independence Day! 🇺🇲
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | PRESENT | NO | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | PRESENT | NO | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.