In #VenturaCounty, extreme weather is already endangering critical infrastructure, including at Naval Base Ventura County and the Port of Hueneme, which are vital to our security and local economy.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 26
Julia Brownley
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 617
Yes43%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 26
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Julia Brownley
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 26
SoupScore
Julia's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 294 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Trump Administration is recklessly attacking the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and putting our communities at risk. Yesterday, @naturalresources.bsky.social called out these dangerous attacks.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
Trump put in place the largest tax increase on the American people yesterday. Meanwhile, House Republicans ran out of DC early so they won't have to defend Trump's tax hike.
On today's Democratic Daily Download, @repdelbene.bsky.social explains what this means for families, businesses and farmers.
For more information, visit 🎨
juliabrownley.house.gov/services/art...
The winning artwork will be displayed in the U.S. Capitol for a year, with the first-place winner and a guardian flown to DC for the exhibit unveiling! The deadline to submit artwork for the 2025 Congressional Art Competition is Thursday, April 17!
Attention #CA26 High School Artists! 👩🎨 Each year, I encourage talented young artists in grades 9-12 throughout #VenturaCounty and the Conejo Valley to participate in the Congressional Art Competition. This is an excellent opportunity to showcase our students’ creativity and talents.
Rather than lowering costs and ensuring access to nutritious meals, Republicans are pushing drastic cuts to SNAP in order to extend tax breaks for billionaires. At a time when grocery, housing, and other everyday costs remain high, these cuts are cruel, unnecessary, and unacceptable.
1 in 8 Americans rely on SNAP, including 17 million children, 8 million seniors, 1.2 million veterans, and 4.5 million people with disabilities. Nearly 20,000 people across Ventura County and the Conejo Valley depend on this vital program to put food on the table.
No child should go to bed hungry. That is why I will keep fighting for federal funding and resources that support Food Share’s mission and ensuring our communities don’t go without.
Instead of helping fight hunger, Trump is making it harder for families to get the food they need. His administration is cutting resources, driving up costs, and worsening food insecurity.
With food costs skyrocketing, lower-income families are struggling more than ever to put meals on the table. Yet, USDA suspended shipments of eggs, dairy, and meat meant for Food Share, a regional food bank that feeds over 250,000 people across #VenturaCounty.
The Trump administration has made no secret of its cruel indifference towards the needs of America's working families – especially those who depend on critical government programs and resources to put food on the table.
And where are House Republicans? Instead of standing up for American families and businesses, they have packed up and gone home for the week.
The reality is that Trump loves to call himself a businessman, but his tariff scheme proves he has no real grasp on how the economy works.
He promised to lower costs on day one. Instead, he's driving up prices on groceries and household goods, sending the stock market into freefall, and alienating our allies – all while flip-flopping on economic policies he clearly doesn’t understand.
Trump is making a mockery and an outright mess of the American economy, pushing reckless tariffs that hurt families and businesses.
Rather than allow remote voting for colleagues on parental leave, Speaker Johnson canceled all votes for the week – choosing to shut down Congress instead of accommodating working parents. Once again, Republicans put their antiquated ideology over working for the American people.
The hypocrisy of House Republicans and Speaker Johnson was on full display this week. While they claim to be the “party of family values,” when it’s time to act, their so-called principles are just empty rhetoric.
Reposted byCongresswoman Julia Brownley
American families deserve leaders who understand the struggles parents face.
That’s why @pettersen.house.gov is fighting to make Congress more accessible to parents and families through her bipartisan resolution to allow new parents in Congress to vote remotely after their child is born.
House Democrats are exposing Republican’s budget scheme to break Social Security and give tax breaks to billionaires. Tune into today’s hearing to listen to the stories of everyday Americans who will be hurt by Elon Musk’s cuts to raid Social Security:
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History617 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
617 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.