Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester
There are a million reasons to support the Equality Act. Here are just a few.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware
Lisa Blunt Rochester
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Lisa Blunt Rochester
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Lisa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 209 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
11 years ago, the Supreme Court affirmed what we already knew to be true: in the land of the free, everyone should be able to marry the person they love.
As we celebrate how far we’ve come, we have to defend our progress and keep pushing this fight forward.
They lied and told us it wasn't a war. Then, they lied and said it was over.
Now, they want us to spend $80 BILLION of your money on the war they never should have started.
This decision not only threatens the safety of our Haitian neighbors but the strength and stability of communities across the country.
It contradicts the values on which our nation was founded and undermines our efforts to respond to the Humanitarian crises facing Haiti.
People are getting priced out of the communities they call home. Workers are forced to move further from their jobs. Families are being forced to live out of their cars.
We heard your voices loud and clear, and we took action to pass the first bold housing package in decades.
Four years ago, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, creating chaos and uncertainty for healthcare access— leaving our communities vulnerable.
No one should question their ability to get the care they need.
We must restore access to reproductive care now.
Good news: the ROAD to Housing Act just took a big step forward!
This historic package will free up billions for affordable housing, stop private equity from buying up single-family homes, and save both time and money.
You asked, we took action. Now, let's finish this!
Congress has spoken.
The people have spoken.
It's time for the Trump administration to end this war they never should have started in the first place.
It doesn't happen often, but... I agree with Thomas Massie
Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester
NEWS: The Senate just passed the biggest housing bill in 30 years!
With the median age of first-time homebuyers at a record high, our bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act would:
— Build more homes
— Lower housing costs
— Stop Wall Street from buying up homes
Next up, the House.
Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester
I just voted YES on the biggest housing bill in more than 30 years.
This bill will boost housing supply, bring down costs, and — for the first time ever — stop private equity from buying up single-family homes.
For many Americans, homeownership has felt out of reach, but the ROAD to Housing Act will help them make that dream a reality.
Let's get it passed.
Republicans in Washington are forcing children to go hungry while they make you pay for Trump’s reckless war and a gold-plated ballroom.
It's unacceptable.
It’s clear that we have a problem on our hands.
Senate democrats are working on policies to lower healthcare costs, but Washington Republicans need to come to the table.
Trump promised the ballroom wouldn’t cost taxpayers a dime.
That was a lie.
He doesn’t care that families are struggling to pay for housing, groceries, and gas if it means he gets his ballroom.
Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester
The historic 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act will address our nation’s housing crisis by boosting housing supply, bringing down costs, and — for the first time ever — stopping private equity from buying up homes.
This bill will be the biggest housing bill in more than 30 years.
Let’s get it done.
This administration keeps the chaos swirling as they fight with their own party about who should have what job.
Putting egos and personal payoffs over our national security makes us all less safe.
DACA was created to help children of immigrants build a life in the only country they’ve ever known. 14 years later, and the attacks on their safety and stability persist.
To all the Dreamers, know that you belong here and we’ll never stop fighting for you.
Today marks 250 years since Delaware declared independence from Pennsylvania and the British Crown.
I had a great time celebrating at New Castle’s annual Separation Day Parade this weekend, where we reminded the world that we are - and always have been - the First State!
Forcing our loved ones to take out loans to cover care is not a solution.
Health care costs are already too high and this proposal by the Trump administration will only set us further back.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-36) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2026-07-21 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-48) |
| 2026-07-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40) |
| 2026-07-16 | S.J. Res. 198 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50) |
| 2026-07-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-14 | S. 4784 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-07-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (46-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 196 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
| 2026-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (48-39) |
| 2026-06-18 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-17 | S. Res. 616 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616 | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-39) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 18Next →