PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Catherine Cortez Masto headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
March 29, 1964
Age 62
Phone
(202) 224-3542
Office
309 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Catherine Cortez Masto

Catherine Marie Cortez Masto is an American lawyer and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Nevada, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, Cortez Masto served as the 32nd attorney general of Nevada from 2007 to 2015.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 831
Yes36%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align91%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenCortezMastoFacebookInstagram
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Catherine Cortez Masto headshot
Catherine Cortez Masto
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Catherine's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 104 sponsored · 248 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 12(source)
If anyone - in the Trump Administration or otherwise - is using insider information about our military operations to profit on prediction markets, that is a serious threat to our national security. That's why I'm pushing for answers and transparency now. (4/4)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 12(source)
Have any other exchanges listed contracts like these on the Maduro operation? Are there any other instances of suspicious trading in this case? What is the CFTC doing to combat insider trading in prediction markets? (3/4)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 12(source)
This market had been largely steady for weeks before, and the account that made $400,000 had been created that same day. The reporting from @wsj.com on these facts raises serious questions, and I'm demanding answers. (2/4) www.wsj.com/world/americ...
A Mystery Trader Made $400,000 Betting on Maduro’s Downfall
The person doubled down Friday with a final bet on Polymarket at 9:58 p.m., shortly before President Trump ordered the military to strike.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 12(source)
Just before 10 pm on Jan. 2, a prediction market betting that Nicolás Maduro would be out of power by the end of the month began to climb. Six hours later, President Trump announced Maduro had been captured and a newly created account walked away with $400,000 in profits. (1/4)
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 9(source)
Over and over again, I have pushed the Trump Administration for a plan to prevent exactly this from happening to tourism and hospitality workers in Nevada. They haven't even bothered to respond, frankly, because the President doesn't care.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 8(source)
Welcome news for Nevada families struggling with soaring health care premiums after Republicans allowed middle-class ACA tax credits to expire. This legislation passed with bipartisan support. Leader Thune must bring it to a vote as soon as possible so we can deliver the relief families need.
The Washington Post
@washingtonpost.com
Open post ↗
Breaking news: More than a dozen House Republicans joined every Democrat to pass a bill extending enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies for three years — the sharpest GOP break with party leadership yet.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 7(source)
Federal law enforcement officers are supposed to be going after predators and drug traffickers, but under the Trump Admin. they are being shifted to Trump and Stephen Miller's mass deportation scheme - leaving all of us less safe as a result.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 6(source)
What a brazen betrayal of the law enforcement officers who were attacked and injured by insurrectionists on January 6th. I remember running into an officer washing his eyes out because he had been pepper-sprayed by the rioters Trump has now pardoned. The President has no shame.⁩
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govJan 6(source)
Every action the Trump Admin. has taken - from soaring fees at our parks to absurd social media requirements - has made America a less attractive option for tourists. That means less income, fewer tips, and a worse-off economy for Nevadans. www.rgj.com/story/news/p...
Social media plan for foreign visitors sparks Nevada tourism worries
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal for international visitors who don't need a visa would mandate sharing 5 years of social media posts.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govDec 16(source)
The CFPB has helped tens of thousands of Nevadans fight predatory lenders, corporate fraud, and unfair business practices. Now, Trump and Russ Vought want to take the cops off the beat. I'm working with my Senate Banking Committee colleagues to stand up for Nevada consumers.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govDec 11(source)
I will continue working in the Senate to lower health care costs for Nevadans in every way that I can. But we cannot forget the reason we are here: Senate Republicans have always cared more about tax breaks for the wealthy than relief for everyday Americans.
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto@cortezmasto.senate.govDec 11(source)
Moments ago, Senate Republicans chose to let Nevadans’ health care premiums soar next month. They rejected a simple, clean extension of the ACA enhanced tax credits that would have given families immediate relief and access to the coverage they need. It’s shameful.
← Newer postsPosts page 21Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
831 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 141 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-50)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 132 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-52)
2026-05-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-05-13S. Res. 526 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (99-0, 3/5 majority required)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 163 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 163YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-05-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-05-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-05-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-05-11S. Res. 690 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (46-45)
2026-04-30S.J. Res. 184 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-30S. Res. 690 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 99 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 139 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-39)
2026-04-28S.J. Res. 124 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 124NONO✓Point of Order Well Taken (51-47)
2026-04-28S. Res. 690 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2026-04-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-49)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-50)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (25-73)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794)NONO✓Motion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S.J. Res. 114 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 138 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138NOYES✕↔Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 32 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32NOYES✕↔Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 123 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-26S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 17Next →