Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 782
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 364 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTammy Duckworth
LIVE NOW 🎧📺 @duckworth.senate.gov joins The People’s Cabinet with a warning for this moment: – Trump’s dangerous Iran mindset – How Dobbs would’ve blocked her IVF care – Why Musk’s DOGE is hurting veterans – What real leadership looks like in crisis #SenDuckworth #IVF #DOGE #Veterans 👇
It’s deeply disturbing that FAA Administrator nominee Bryan Bedford refuses to commit to upholding the 1,500-hour pilot training standard.   After the DCA crash and surge in near-misses, now is NOT the time to weaken flight training requirements for pilots.   I’ll be voting no.
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
President Trump "wants to thump his chest" and is "itching to use America’s military might somewhere around the world.” – @duckworth.senate.gov Before he bombed Iran sites, she called him “the lead person drumming on the drums of war." “Not in the interest of the United States.” #ForeignPolicy
Trump bombing Iran was illegal and unjustified. I ran for Congress to make sure our leaders consider the true costs of war. And I will be in the Senate, standing on my titanium legs, demanding answers from Trump. My statement:
Duckworth statement on Trump’s strikes against Iran nuclear sites.
Duckworth statement on Trump’s strikes against Iran nuclear sites.
Trump's tariffs are a tax hike on new parents. Parents who can barely afford baby items—including strollers, car seats, cribs, high chairs and baby monitors—know who to blame. "Liberation Day" was a failure—and families are still paying for it.
By repealing critical energy tax credits, Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” would cost: ❌ $80 billion in U.S. manufacturing ❌ $50 billion in exports ❌ Up to $1,080 a year per household This isn’t helping working Americans. It’s throwing them and our economy under the bus.
Trump campaigned on a promise to protect IVF. What’s the holdup? Republicans control Congress. I’m ready to help get it done. It’s the least he could do since he’s the reason IVF is at risk in the first place. But Trump is all talk. No action.
President Trump said he was the “fertilization President.” @duckworth.senate.gov is calling him on his promise to expand IVF. It’s personal — after Dobbs, her own care would now be illegal. #ReproRights #IVF #Dobbs #Duckworth #FertilizationPresident #Trump
I'm disgusted. This Afghan ally served alongside our troops, was here legally, showed up for his hearing, followed every rule— And he was targeted by ICE anyway. Our nation promised to protect him. But there is simply no one Donald Trump won't betray. www.cbsnews.com/news/afghan-...
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
President Trump said he was the “fertilization President.” @duckworth.senate.gov is calling him on his promise to expand IVF. It’s personal — after Dobbs, her own care would now be illegal. #ReproRights #IVF #Dobbs #Duckworth #FertilizationPresident #Trump
The GOP's “Big Beautiful Betrayal” would rip health care away from over 13.7 million Americans—   And hospitals and providers are expected to face up to $31 BILLION in uncompensated care costs.   Under Republicans' bill, EVERYONE would pay the price.   Except for billionaires.
On June 19, 1865, word finally spread to Galveston, Texas, that the cruel and unjust enslavement of Black Americans had ended. Today is a day to celebrate freedom, reflect on the progress made and reject attempts to erase our history. Happy Juneteenth, everyone.
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
Duckworth to Hegseth: "You are blowing through money like my fellow cadets and I did in our first liberty after basic camp. Luckily I didn't end up with a questionable tattoo ... you're just an unqualified yes man who can't tell the president how to keep Americans safe."
Horrified by the targeted killing of Minnesota State Rep. and Speaker Emeritus Melissa Hortman and shooting of State Sen. John Hoffman. My heart is with the victims, their loved ones and all Minnesotans. Political violence has no place in America.
DEVELOPING: Minnesota lawmaker and husband were killed, another injured in what Gov. Walz called a “politically motivated assassination.” The suspect remains at large.
Happy 250th birthday to U.S. Army! 🇺🇸 The brave men and women of our Army are the real heroes we should be celebrating. Not a wannabe king who throws himself a $40 million birthday parade.
I am closely monitoring the developing conflict between Israel and Iran as well as keeping the safety and security of U.S. forces, personnel and citizens in the region in mind. I encourage both sides to seek de-escalation in this dangerous moment for the Middle East and for global stability.
BREAKING: Explosions rang out across Iran’s capital as Israel claimed it was attacking the country.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
782 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (24-76)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 16Next →