Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes29%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 54 sponsored · 392 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The Supreme Court just struck down Trump's illegal tariffs that made the cost of groceries, toys and so many everyday essentials skyrocket. This is a win for the American people. But it won't put the money they've already spent back in their pockets. www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...
You called our concerns "fake news" just yesterday. You're backtracking because you know this new rule could hurt our heroes' access to care, and Veterans across the country called you on your bullshit. If you take Veterans' concerns seriously, you'd rescind the rule entirely.
VA Secretary Doug Collins statement announcing that, effective immediately, VA is halting enforcement of the interim final rule, Evaluative Rating: Impact of Medication.
This disgusting rule change could punish disabled Vets for following their treatment plans and discourage them from seeking the care they've earned. Yet another middle finger to our heroes from Trump, the most anti-Veteran President in history.
Stars & Stripes: Veterans slam new VA rule for determining disability ratings
On Presidents Day, we honor the leaders who have put country over self and the Constitution over power. That standard still matters— Even when the person in office falls short of it.
Heartbroken to see this tragic news. Ofelia never should have had to fight so hard just so she could be with her father during her brave battle with cancer. My thoughts go out to her family and loved ones as they struggle with this difficult loss.
A Chicago family is heartbroken after 16-year-old Ofelia Torres tragically lost her battle with a rare form of cancer. She spent her final days fighting for her dad's release from ICE custody after he was arrested during Operation Midway Blitz. MORE: https://tinyurl.com/4zb8kwws
Image 1
Donald Trump is thanking our Veterans for their service by eliminating their abortion care—even in cases of rape, incest or health concerns. Women servicemembers experience higher rates of sexual assault and fertility issues. This latest betrayal of our heroes must be reversed.
CQ: Senate Dems demand VA reverse ‘cruel’ abortion ban
It’s been 117 years since the NAACP was founded in the wake of the Springfield Race Riots, where Black Illinoisans lost their homes, businesses and lives. Out of tragedy came a new era of leadership. Because when Americans face oppression, we come together and demand better.
We can keep our communities safe without having masked federal agents terrorizing people and killing Americans in the street.   That's all Democrats are asking for.
Trump is yet again sacrificing our future to protect polluters' profits. He just decimated EPA's power to protect our planet and public health from climate change—and it will hit underserved communities hardest. He's lining billionaires' pockets, and we're paying the price.
AP: Trump’s EPA revokes scientific finding that underpinned US fight against climate change
Trump tried to weaponize our DOJ to go after his political critics. But Americans on jury duty stood up and upheld our Constitution when their own President wouldn’t. Senators Kelly and Slotkin are American patriots. Unlike those who put retribution before the rule of law.
Alex Pretti. Renee Good. Keith Porter. Silverio Villegas González. One life taken by Trump's violent, masked secret police is too many. Republicans need to come to the table and help us rein them in.
Masked federal agents are gunning down American citizens in cold blood. Kristi Noem is threatening the watchdog that’s supposed to investigate this Administration's abuse. Things need to change. Fast. Democrats are fighting to rein in Trump's DHS.
DHS IG denied my request for more coordinated investigations into Trump’s lawless agents. Then, I learned Kristi Noem repeatedly reminded DHS’s IG that she can unilaterally kill any investigation. Why would she do that? 🤔 Feels like a threat to me.
NBC News: DHS warned its independent watchdog that Noem can kill its investigations, senator says
A Border Patrol agent shot her five times—then bragged about it to his buddies.   Today, a federal court ruled those texts must be released.   The American people deserve transparency just as much as Marimar deserves justice.
There is no excuse. We have seen these vile, hateful depictions before. We know its intent. This blatant racism toward former President and First Lady Obama has no place in America. Trump is a national embarrassment to our country.
President Trump posted a video including imagery depicting former President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as apes.
ICE investigators were supposed to investigate the killing of Alex Pretti. Instead, they investigated Alex. Not his killers. With FBI now leading this probe, I’m calling on Kristi Noem and Kash Patel: Remove all ICE agents from this investigation completely.
Duckworth’s letter to Noem and Patel.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-03-25End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (73-25)
2025-03-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-31)
2025-03-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (62-30)
2025-03-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (63-32)
2025-03-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (64-33)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (54-46)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (27-73)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 18Next →