PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Kirsten E. Gillibrand headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
December 9, 1966
Age 59
Phone
(202) 224-4451
Office
478 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Kirsten E. Gillibrand

Kirsten Elizabeth Gillibrand is an American lawyer and politician serving as the junior United States senator from New York since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, she served as member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 2007 to 2009.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes32%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @GillibrandNYFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Kirsten E. Gillibrand headshot
Kirsten E. Gillibrand
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Kirsten E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 58 sponsored · 324 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 24(source)
From grocery prices to utility bills to health care costs, just about everything is getting more expensive. But instead of providing relief and reversing their disastrous health care cuts, the Trump administration is threatening to shut down the government.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 24(source)
Millions of hardworking American families are struggling to put food on the table, and how does the Trump administration respond? They cut SNAP benefits and terminate the annual Household Food Security reports. They're literally taking away food from hungry families and hiding the consequences.
Trump ends annual report on U.S. hunger amid rising food insecurity
The Trump administration is ending a decades-long report on U.S. hunger, calling it “politicized.” Last year, the USDA report warned of rising food insecurity.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 19(source)
My dog Maple is a member of our family, & it breaks my heart to hear of hardworking Americans being forced to choose between their beloved pet & their skyrocketing household bills. We must fight to lower everyday costs for hardworking families, so they can afford groceries & keep their companions.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 18(source)
We're facing a cost-of-living crisis in this country. But instead of working to lower costs for Americans, this administration has slashed programs — like Medicaid & SNAP — & slapped the Trump Tariff Tax on everyday goods. We need to come together to stand up for working people, not billionaires.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 16(source)
This administration has terminated union contracts and threatened massive workforce cuts, driving away health care workers who want to dedicate their lives to caring for our veterans. We need to stand up for our VA workers and ensure our veterans receive the top quality care they've earned.
Veterans’ Care at Risk Under Trump as Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals
Amid concerns about the stability of the agency, records show nearly 40% of the doctors offered jobs at the VA from January through March of this year turned them down — quadruple the rate of rejectio...
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 15(source)
Working families are struggling to make ends meet, and the Trump Tariff Tax is only making things worse. President Trump should be working to bring costs down, not pushing Americans into poverty. www.cnn.com/2025/09/10/b...
Trump’s tariffs could push nearly 1 million Americans into poverty, report finds | CNN Business
President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff regime is already reshaping global trade and spiking government customs revenue. But these historic import taxes could also push more Americans into poverty, a...
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 11(source)
They ran up the towers when everyone else was running down. They spent months on the Pile, putting out fires and searching for remains. And when the cameras turned off, they stayed to clean up our city and rebuild our communities. #NeverForget
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 11(source)
24 years ago today, our nation was attacked, thousands of innocent lives were taken, and our city was changed forever. As we honor those we lost today, we are also reminded of the extraordinary first responders who answered the call.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialSep 8(source)
These heroes ran toward danger and helped rebuild our communities after 9/11. They shouldn't have to fight for the health care they need. Democrats and Republicans must work together to fully fund the World Trade Center Health Program.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialAug 30(source)
No rebranding will distract Americans from the truth: the Big Beautiful Bill took away health care and food assistance from our most vulnerable neighbors to give tax cuts to billionaires. It's unpopular because it's un-American. www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...
Donald Trump says he wants to rebrand his 'big, beautiful bill'
The president, who has leaned into his branding skills, said the name he selected "was good for getting it approved, but it’s not good for explaining to people what it’s all about."
← Newer postsPosts page 24Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Motion Agreed to (85-5)
2026-06-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-39)
2026-06-18H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-17S. Res. 616 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50)
2026-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-17—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (55-39)
2026-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-16H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 172 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 190 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48)
2026-06-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-43)
2026-06-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43)
2026-06-11—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2026-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-06-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-06-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804)NONO✓Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-51)
2026-06-05S. 1318 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (52-47)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (45-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Coons Amdt. No. 5457)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Durbin Amdt. No. 5806)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Booker Amdt. No. 5803)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 5485)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5451)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (45-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04S. 2 (119th)Motion (Warnock Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-52)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kim Amdt. No. 5545)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 5501)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (51-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Graham Amdt. No. 5779)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 5556)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 18Next →