PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Kirsten E. Gillibrand headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
December 9, 1966
Age 59
Phone
(202) 224-4451
Office
478 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Kirsten E. Gillibrand

Kirsten Elizabeth Gillibrand is an American lawyer and politician serving as the junior United States senator from New York since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, she served as member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 2007 to 2009.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes32%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @GillibrandNYFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Kirsten E. Gillibrand headshot
Kirsten E. Gillibrand
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Kirsten E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 58 sponsored · 324 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 30(source)
If skyrocketing hold times and website crashes weren't enough, DOGE's cuts will force our seniors to make nearly 2 million extra trips to SSA offices annually. And after all that, they only found two cases of potential fraud out of over 110,000 new cases. That's not efficiency — that's failure.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 30(source)
Natalie is right — cancer shouldn't be political. President Trump's NIH cuts are hurting Americans battling life-threatening diseases. It's time for Republicans to join Democrats and stand up for our constituents.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 29(source)
160 years ago, President Lincoln promised that America would care for our veterans & their families. Now, President Trump & his DOGE boys are gutting the agency that fulfills Lincoln's promise. We can't let this administration turn its back on our heroes.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 28(source)
That's right — losses from uninsured patients cut from Medicaid could get passed down to privately insured Americans and drive up the cost of health care. We're already paying the price for President Trump's tariff chaos, and the American people can't afford another bill from the Republican Party.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 26(source)
Today, we honor our fallen service members and hold their families in our hearts. Last December, Jonnie and I visited the Luxembourg American Cemetery where so many of our fallen American soldiers are memorialized. We will never forget their courage or their sacrifice.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 23(source)
DOGE is meddling with Social Security and attempting to access our sensitive data, and now the Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to help them hide their destruction. The American people deserve transparency.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 23(source)
Millions of families rely on SNAP to put food on the table. But instead of improving or expanding the program, House Republicans voted to cut SNAP funding to give tax breaks to billionaires. Our children deserve better.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 23(source)
House Republicans just voted to cut Medicaid for at least 8.6 million Americans — including children, seniors, pregnant women, veterans, and people with disabilities. I'm ready to fight these cuts in the Senate, but we all need to come together to sound the alarm.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 21(source)
DOGE promised to "eliminate fraud" at the Social Security Administration. Instead, they crashed the website, drove up wait times, destroyed customer service, and terrified our seniors. And after all that, they only found two cases of possible fraud out of 110,000 calls.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 20(source)
Families across our country depend on SNAP to feed their kids. The choice is simple — House Republicans can choose to help families put food on the table, or they can vote to put more money in the pockets of billionaires.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 19(source)
I'm deeply saddened to hear President Biden has been diagnosed with cancer. He served our nation with unparalleled determination and courage, and I have no doubt he will face this next battle with the same strength. I'm praying for Jill and the entire Biden family during this difficult time.
Kirsten Gillibrand@kirstengillibrand.bsky.socialMay 16(source)
President Trump is too busy thinking about the $400 million jet he wants to accept from the Qatari royal family to consider how his Trump Tariff Tax is going to increase prices for you. The American people deserve a president that cares about their wallets, not his own.
← Newer postsPosts page 30Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Motion Agreed to (85-5)
2026-06-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-39)
2026-06-18H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-17S. Res. 616 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50)
2026-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-17—Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNO—Nomination Confirmed (55-39)
2026-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41)
2026-06-16H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 172 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48)
2026-06-16S.J. Res. 190 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48)
2026-06-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-43)
2026-06-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43)
2026-06-11—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2026-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-06-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-06-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804)NONO✓Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-51)
2026-06-05S. 1318 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (52-47)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (45-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Coons Amdt. No. 5457)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05S. 2 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2026-06-05—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Durbin Amdt. No. 5806)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Booker Amdt. No. 5803)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 5485)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5451)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (45-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04S. 2 (119th)Motion (Warnock Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-52)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kim Amdt. No. 5545)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 5501)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (51-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Graham Amdt. No. 5779)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-06-04—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 5556)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 18Next →