PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MartinHeinrichFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 241 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govAug 9(source)
Increasing energy demand and Republicans’ Big, Bad Bill is creating a perfect storm that will hit New Mexicans in their electric bills. They deserve to know it’s coming–and why. Today I held a roundtable on the real impacts of the Republican bill and how we can push back.
Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse@whitehouse.senate.govAug 6(source)
Trump's Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires Bill will raise your energy prices. @heinrich.senate.gov and I explain how: www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN9O...
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse
@whitehouse.senate.gov
Open post ↗
“On the campaign trail, President Donald Trump promised to bring energy prices down…But electricity prices are still going up, and Trump’s signature legislative accomplishment [the Beautiful For Billionaires Bill] is likely to raise prices further.” Yup.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govAug 7(source)
From daily news to kids’ shows to emergency alerts, public broadcasting is the lifeblood of our communities. To Republicans, they're just another line item to gut. @lujan.senate.gov and I met with NM public broadcasting leaders to discuss how to fight Republicans’ reckless cuts.
Senators Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Luján pose outside KANW with New Mexico's public broadcast leaders.
Senator Martin Heinrich listens to public broadcast leaders at the head of a long table.
Senator Martin Heinrich listens to New Mexican public broadcast leaders as they discuss the future of public broadcasting.
Senators Ben Ray Luján and Martin Heinrich at the head of the table at the New Mexico Public Broadcasting Roundtable.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govAug 7(source)
TUNE IN NOW: @lujan.senate.gov and I are talking with New Mexico public broadcasting leaders to discuss their stations’ essential role and how we can fight back against Republicans’ funding cuts. 📻: KANW & KRWG 📺: KNME
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govAug 5(source)
5 years ago, we passed the Great American Outdoors Act and permanently funded the LWCF. Today, we’re seeing the results: the Achenbach Canyon property is now public land—thanks to LWCF Recreation Access funds. Improving access to OUR public lands is exactly why we fought for it.
Achenbach Canyon landscape
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govAug 5(source)
Too many New Mexicans are seeing insurance premiums skyrocket, losing coverage, or being priced out of their homes. That's unacceptable. We need a clearer picture of how worsening wildfires and climate risks are impacting insurance companies’ decisions.
Link
Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govAug 4(source)
This is all Trump and his Big, Bad Bill. Not through neglect but by active malice. Killing tens of thousands of good jobs, smashing manufacturing, and drying up billions in investment. No wonder the jobs numbers are so bad.
Chart: The clean-energy manufacturing boom is going bust
Since Trump took office, nearly $28 billion worth of investment in U.S. cleantech factories has been paused, canceled, or otherwise delayed.
Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
Senate Energy Dems@energydems.senate.govAug 1(source)
“The story is just too simple: Democrats passed a law to encourage clean energy called the Inflation Reduction Act. Republicans repealed it. Energy prices inflated.” The electricity affordability crisis is coming, and Republicans are the ones who are fast-tracking it.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govAug 1(source)
An incredibly bad jobs report in which most of the jobs added in July were in health care–an industry soon to be decimated by Trump’s Big, Ugly Bill. But don’t worry, he's putting in a $200M ballroom at the White House.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govJul 31(source)
On World Ranger Day, I want to say a special “thank you” to those park service rangers who are no longer wearing the uniform as a result of the Trump Administration’s decision to push out a quarter of the NPS workforce. I appreciate everything you have done in service to our parks and communities.
← Newer postsPosts page 20Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33)
2025-06-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-18—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46)
2025-06-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Bill Passed (68-30)
2025-06-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-06-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-40)
2025-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-06-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39)
2025-06-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (67-30)
2025-06-12—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307)YESNO✕↔Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-12S. 1582 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Failed (45-52)
2025-06-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 54 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S.J. Res. 53 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56)
2025-06-11S. 1582 (119th)End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required)
2025-06-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 89NOT_VOTINGNO—Joint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNO—Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 87NOT_VOTINGNO—Joint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNO—Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 88NOT_VOTINGNO—Joint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNO—Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNO—Joint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNO—Point of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NOT_VOTINGNO—Point of Order Sustained (51-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 10 / 16Next →