PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MartinHeinrichFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 241 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 3(source)
The men and women who have dedicated their lives to protecting our public lands are being laid off in the thousands and it’s going to hurt our ability to respond to fire season. Donald Trump and Elon Musk are putting our people, our homes, and our lands at risk.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 3(source)
Need assistance? My staff is here to help. This Friday, you can visit them in-person in Las Cruces for help with Social Security benefits, Medicare, Medicaid, immigration, veterans’ benefits, student loans, and other federal programs.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govMar 1(source)
Too many families in New Mexico have felt the impacts of addiction and I’ve made it a priority to fund lifesaving programs and treatments like this one at Taos Whole Community Health. www.taosnews.com/news/health/...
Taos Whole Community Health explores new addiction treatments
Beginning this spring, Taos Whole Community Health will offer its first eight-week program to help promote long-term recovery from substance use disorders. The program will use mind-body techniques …
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 28(source)
The President of the United States—the leader of the free world—just chastised a staunch U.S. ally and democratically-elected foreign leader for defending his country against a brutal dictator. And he did it in the Oval Office. Embarrassing and dangerous.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 28(source)
You know the people who make sure you get severe weather warnings when there’s a flood or a big storm coming? Trump-Elon just fired hundreds of them. Making us all less safe, to skim more $ for tax handouts to their billionaire donors. apnews.com/article/nati...
Hundreds of weather forecasters fired in latest wave of DOGE cuts
Federal workers who were not let go said the afternoon layoffs included meteorologists who do crucial local forecasts in National Weather Service offices across the U.S.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 28(source)
In New Mexico, Trump-Musk’s illegal firings will limit access to Carlsbad Caverns National Park, make the park less safe, threaten local economies driven by outdoor recreation, and cut off services like ranger-led tours and school field trips. www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...
National Parks cutting hours, limiting services as Trump layoffs reduce staffing
Advocates say park workers are being pulled from important roles to help manage traffic and maintain basic infrastructure.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 27(source)
This is happening all over the country. The people who take care of your public lands are being laid off–including the ones who help us fight fires–just when we’re going to need them most. www.kuer.org/politics-gov...
Mass Forest Service firings provoke community backlash in an Idaho resort town
Massive federal layoffs are hitting communities across the West, including rural, recreation hotspots like McCall, Idaho. Here's how that town is responding.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 27(source)
Glad to see USDA is listening to my calls to bring Avian flu under control by starting to vaccinate laying hens. Wish RFK wasn’t simultaneously disbanding the effort to vaccinate people from the seasonal flu…. 🐓💉🤧
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 27(source)
Republicans’ Plan: Step One: Fire thousands of workers who manage our public lands Step Two: Say these lands aren’t being managed and need to be transferred to states Step Three: Sell the lands off to the highest bidder www.outdoorlife.com/conservation...
Feds Fire 4,400+ Public-Land Employees, Including Forest Service Workers, National Park Staff
Massive layoffs at the Department of the Interior included thousands of U.S. Forest Service and National Park employees.
Reposted bySenator Martin Heinrich
LCV – League of Conservation Voters 🌎@lcv.orgFeb 26(source)
“Clearly, we need to put an end to this stunt that will fuel a REAL energy emergency, kill thousands of jobs, and raise electricity costs on American families.” @senatorheinrich.bsky.social and @kaine.senate.gov are working to protect working families and stop Trump’s sham “energy emergency” 👏
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govFeb 26(source)
Ben Archer Health Center is turning away KIDS & patients without birth certificates to prove citizenship, at school clinics and other clinics. This is NOT okay. We have a measles outbreak and skyrocketing grocery prices, and Donald Trump is focusing on THIS?!
← Newer postsPosts page 34Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2026-03-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-03-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-03-23—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-03-22—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Rejected (41-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (49-41, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-20H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (47-37, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-18S.J. Res. 118 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 118YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-17S. 1383 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-48)
2026-03-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-03-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-03-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-12H.R. 6644 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (89-10)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (82-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (84-10)
2026-03-10H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (89-9, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-10—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-29)
2026-03-09—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-28)
2026-03-05H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-04S.J. Res. 104 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 104YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-04H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2026-03-02H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-33)
2026-02-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-34)
2026-02-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-02-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-02-24H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-12H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (49-47)
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2026-02-10S.J. Res. 95 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2026-02-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2026-02-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2026-02-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-46)
2026-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2026-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (58-39)
2026-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-39)
2026-02-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-02-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-40)
2026-02-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (71-29, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 4287)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 16Next →