Our government’s number 1 job is to keep people safe. I know that’s what the well-trained local law enforcement officers in NH & across the country work to do every day as they de-escalate situations & protect and serve our communities. The Trump Administration is failing to meet this basic standard
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Margaret Wood Hassan
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes40%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align87%
Cross-party13%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Margaret Wood Hassan
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Margaret Wood's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 210 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Instead, we’re seeing American citizens killed by masked federal agents, people denied basic due process, and enflamed tensions and division that are making our communities less safe.
We should be working together to reform our immigration system so that we have strong border security and are removing violent criminals. That’s not what is happening under this Administration.
What ICE is doing in Minnesota and on many streets across the country is unacceptable, unconscionable, and it has to stop.
As the President's reckless tariffs continue to raise costs and hurt small businesses across NH, I visited Solomon's, a family-owned grocery in the North Country, to hear about the damage caused by Trump's decision to undermine our relationship with Canada.
President Trump has chosen to increase people’s costs. That’s what tariffs do.
53 years ago, Roe v. Wade affirmed a fundamental truth: women deserve the freedom to make their own health care decisions. That right was ripped away in 2022, but we must keep fighting to ensure women are free & equal citizens in this country.
Secretary Kennedy is a threat to public health, and his actions are hurting New Hampshire children and families.
I’m grateful to the doctors and families I met today in Concord who are speaking out about the dangers of Kennedy’s attacks on science and vaccines.
Yesterday I heard from small business owners in Nashua about how rising costs – including cost increases driven by President Trump’s reckless tariffs – are harming their businesses and their customers.
Today we celebrate the life and legacy of Martin Luther King Jr., and we recommit ourselves to his fight for progress toward a more just and equal society.
My bipartisan bill to strengthen cybersecurity in rural hospitals passed out of committee.
Many Granite Staters rely on rural hospitals for their care, and it’s crucial that they are prepared for modern security threats.
MADCO3D is one of many Granite State businesses on the cutting edge of innovation.
It was great to visit their model home today and see firsthand the progress they are making using technological advances to save time and money in housing construction.
New in Allrecipes: Despite President Trump’s promises that he would lower grocery costs, families across America are paying higher prices at the cash register. The data is clear - costs are too high, and Trump’s actions are only making them worse.
www.allrecipes.com/joint-econom...
Outrageous. The Trump administration terminated $2 billion in mental health and addiction prevention grants. Communities nationwide will lose critical services for people in crisis.
The Administration must reverse course, immediately – lives are on the line.
www.npr.org/2026/01/14/n...
Students with disabilities often face unnecessary barriers and costly tests to reestablish documented disabilities when they head off to college.
I helped introduce a bill so colleges accept high school documentation – saving both students and schools time and money.
I’ve never had Granite Staters ask me to focus more on corporations and less on real people. But the Trump Administration continues to sell out Americans in service of corporate special interests.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/12/c...
Saddened to hear about the death of a New Hampshire native in the line of duty.
I join Granite Staters in keeping Officer Garretson’s family in my thoughts.
www.wmur.com/article/poli...
Great news: my bipartisan bill, which increases monthly pensions for living Medal of Honor recipients, is now law. While we can never repay the debt that we owe to these extraordinary heroes, we can ensure that they receive the support they deserve.
www.wcax.com/2026/01/06/m...
Great to celebrate the 2025 Granite Staters of the Month today and honor the work that they are doing to make New Hampshire a better place to live.
No Granite Stater should go hungry. I visited Gather in Portsmouth today and heard from local organizations that are helping New Hampshire seniors access healthy food. I'll continue working to support organizations that help everyone in our communities thrive.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.