Reposted byTina Smith
This is really what it comes down to.
I'm holding the Senate floor to say HELL NO to Trump destroying our We the People government.
🔗 www.youtube.com/live/bE37g0m...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byTina Smith
RFK Jr. said the Rural Health Transformation Program is the “biggest infusion of federal dollars into rural health care” in U.S. history. But rural areas will lose more in Medicaid cuts than they might gain from a new rural health program.
kffhealthnews.org/news/article...
Reposted byTina Smith
DHS says they “don’t arrest U.S. citizens for immigration enforcement.”
But at least 170 Americans they’ve detained know that’s not true.
Don’t ignore their stories.
If Trump can detain citizens—including combat Veterans—for days without cause, no one is safe from his whims.
Reposted byTina Smith
This Trump government shutdown is not like his last one.
That was about building a wall that Mexico was supposed to pay for.
This is about raising health care costs for millions of Americans.
It’s time to end the shutdown and fix the Republican-made health care crisis.
Wishing everyone in Minnesota and across the world a happy Diwali! May this festival of lights be full of joy and hope.
Seeing the White House torn apart is really emblematic of the times we’re in
The only people doing well right now seem to be AI executives, crypto bros and the Trump family.
The only people doing well right now seem to be AI executives, crypto bros and the Trump family.
If a "clean CR" spikes my constituents’ health insurance premiums, it’s not clean. It’s dirty and puts the interests of the richest Americans ahead of Minnesota and I won’t vote for it.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
But when we ask to help our own citizens pay for health insurance they shut down the whole government
Land of 10,000 Lakes and No Kings ❌👑
Send me your best No Kings posters! I would like to see them!
Reposted byTina Smith
Either Mike Johnson doesn't read the news or he's lying.
He should read this story about a 10 year old US citizen with brain cancer who you and Trump deported away from her doctors.
This is what your "mass deportations" are doing.
Reposted byTina Smith
Unfortunately, reality is only apparent *after* elections.
We were actually getting somewhere, too. 😞
@sbmitche.bsky.social
www.library.hbs.edu/working-know...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-08 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.