Congress formally apologized to the descendants of those killed in the massacre in 1990.
Congress recommended reviewing the recipients for a reason – because actions that warrant our highest military honors should represent America’s values.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This was the wrong decision. Revoking their Medals of Honor would help tell the true story.
There’s a reason it’s usually referred to as the Wounded Knee Massacre – American soldiers mercilessly killed unarmed Lakota men, women, children and elders.
There was no honor in what happened that day. This is a stain on our history.
He was a passionate advocate for protecting the Boundary Waters. And up until his final days he was encouraging me to think about how Minnesota’s unique civic values are so deeply needed in this moment in our country. Bless him, he was a true public servant and friend.
Dick Moe was a dear friend, mentor and advisor to me and I will miss him so much. As Chief of Staff to Senator and Vice President Mondale, Dick knew a thing or two about the Senate, and I’ll treasure our conversations in the Senate dining room about how to be a good Minnesota Senator.
“It represents the most significant legal step yet by the Trump administration to harry, punish and humiliate a former official the president identified as an enemy, at the expense of procedural safeguards intended to shield the Justice Department from political interference and personal vendettas.”
Trump has turned the Justice Department into a weapon for his personal vengeance, plain and simple.
“Review” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
It has been thoroughly reviewed. Mifepristone is safe… but that doesn’t fit in with their agenda so they’re going to find a way to restrict it anyways.
But he gets a new ballroom at the White House and Argentina gets $20,000,000,000
Can think of a lot of hospitals, schools and food pantries that could use twenty billion dollars to actually help our own citizens…
You left out the part about how your Big, Beautiful Bill cut $137B from rural health care. I know you’re gutting the Education Department, but don’t worry, I did the math for you:
-$137B + $50B = -$87B
1) Take food money from hungry families
2) Start trade war that drives up food costs
3) Stop tracking the # of hungry families
4) Declare hunger solved without actually feeding people
People can’t afford a 70% hike in their health insurance costs. They’re already barely scraping by as it is. That’s what we’re trying to solve.
Meanwhile, he’s throwing a temper tantrum because we are using our leverage to get a deal to SAVE AMERICANS’ HEALTH CARE.
Go ahead and ask Americans if they can afford a 70% hike in their health insurance premiums right now. See how that goes.
It’s a crisis in the making that we’re TRYING to avoid, but Trump is refusing to meet with us.
Minnesotan and Medal of Honor recipient Willibald Bianchi is finally coming home. His story is one of courage and sacrifice, and now we can honor his legacy and offer his family long-overdue peace.
To all Minnesotans gathering tonight at sundown to celebrate Rosh Hashanah: Archie and I are wishing you a sweet and meaningful New Year. Shanah Tovah!
For months they’ve known they’d need our votes, and they did nothing.
They watched this car crash in slow motion… and sat on their hands.
![Burgess Everett & @burgessev
"I think a 600-pound man is more likely to pass up a donut than the Democrats [are to] shut down the government," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did%3Aplc%3Adqj6ug6nsm7giy3xd4dpuhmx/bafkreihjk53qbmeo4d3sqgdxslitqszeiv3e3f66kzfgr3j5bfc3aaa2fm@jpeg)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (46-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S. 1582 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31) |
| 2025-05-19 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-05-15 | S. Res. 195 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-05-15 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.