Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 181 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Epstein files are real but also they’re not but they’re on Pam Bondi’s desk and we’re going to release them but we also can’t (even though we promised we would) and let's talk about someone else because this is really inconvenient for us and even our own supporters are furious
30 years of public service is no small feat - advocating for farmers, veterans, and working families in Buffalo and across the state. Senator Anderson will be remembered as a fighter for the state he loved.
May his memory be a blessing.
Reposted byTina Smith
I’m confused. Trump says the Epstein files are a hoax. But they’re on AG Bondi’s desk for review. Also, they don’t exist. And if they did exist, they were written by Barack Obama.
The “most transparent administration in history” is shutting down a branch of government early because that’s how badly they don’t want to release the Epstein files.
Reposted byTina Smith
Jim Parsons slams Donald Trump for removing LGBTQ+ specialising counselors from the 988 Suicide lifeline:
“It is only hurtful and it feels like it’s only being done in order to make a point — we’re getting rid of this because we want to make sure certain people understand they’re not welcome here.”
Amy’s right. Republicans are rewarding states for creating more waste and committing more fraud.
For all that talk from Congressional Republicans about eliminating waste, they ultimately rewarded it in their Big Beautiful Betrayal. More from me in @postopinions.bsky.social:
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Has anyone checked Mar-A-Lago for the Epstein files? Heard he likes to keep sensitive documents there...
With a clean bill of health, I’m ready to get back to work fighting for Minnesotans.
What’s that old saying? A donut a day keeps the doctor away? 🍩🤭
In all seriousness, an immense, heartfelt thank you to everyone for the well wishes, and a special thanks to my incredible care team at George Washington University Hospital.
Out of an abundance of caution, they are keeping her overnight for observation. She expects to be back at work very soon.
A NOTE FROM SENATOR SMITH'S STAFF
--
While at work at the Capitol today, Sen. Smith started to not feel well. She went to the Capitol physician who recommended she undergo more thorough examination at GW hospital.
Reposted byTina Smith
Unbelievable. Just days after the tragic flooding in Texas, NOAA is demanding that public TV stations remove equipment from towers that is critical for these stations to send weather alerts. Trump’s ideological crusade against public broadcasting will cost lives.
Reposted byTina Smith
From lifesaving weather and news alerts to educational programming for children, public broadcasting keeps our communities safe and informed.
That’s what President Trump wants to take away from Americans.
Let’s not forget that the prosecutor who gave Epstein a secret sweetheart deal back in 2007 — allowing Epstein to continue assaulting girls — was rewarded by Trump with a cabinet spot.
Alex Acosta gave Epstein immunity.
Reposted byTina Smith
Republicans are calling one of these “propaganda.”
You’ll never guess which one.
America is literally burning a million pounds of food at taxpayer expense so Trump doesn’t have to give it to hungry kids across the world.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44) |
| 2026-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2026-02-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (71-29, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 4287) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Table Agreed to (58-42) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Table Agreed to (67-33) |
| 2026-01-30 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (32-67) |
| 2026-01-29 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-27 | S. 3627 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (82-15) |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-14 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 98 | YES | YES | ✓ | Point of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2026-01-13 | S.J. Res. 84 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-01-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-40) |
| 2026-01-08 | S.J. Res. 98 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2026-01-07 | S.J. Res. 86 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (43-50) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-01-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-36) |
| 2025-12-18 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-12-18 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (50-50) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. Res. 412 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-29) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (69-27) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2025-12-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-12-17 | S. 1071 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (77-20) |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 1071 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 1071 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (75-22) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 3385 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-11 | S. 3386 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-12-10 | S. Res. 532 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-12-10 | S.J. Res. 82 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-12-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-12-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-12-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (57-32) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.