Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Billy Long is going to be the chief tax collector as head of the IRS, even though he received kickbacks for pushing bogus tax breaks that didn't exist. The blatant corruption of this Administration is never-ending.
This is horrifying. Archie and I are grieving for Yaron and Sarah, and our hearts go out to their loved ones and the Jewish community in pain right now. We must condemn this horrific act of antisemitic violence and hate.
BREAKING: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said he is “shocked” by the “horrific, antisemitic” shooting of two staff members of the Israeli embassy in Washington. Netanyahu said he had instructed Israeli missions around the world to beef up security.
Every Minnesotan deserves to be safe in their homes and neighborhoods, and that safety must include freedom from unconstitutional and discriminatory policing. This work isn’t finished yet, and we will keep holding ourselves accountable.
The Minneapolis Police Department has taken steps in the right direction and is committed to continuing that work even as the federal government walks away.
Thankfully, the City of Minneapolis and Minnesota state leaders continue to stand on the side of justice. The state-negotiated consent decree remains in place to continue working toward meaningful reform.
This decree was based on the DOJ's own investigation, which found a pattern of unconstitutional and discriminatory policing practices that have hurt our community, especially Black and Native American people and people will mental illness, for decades. Abandoning it is deeply disturbing.
It’s especially painful that this decision comes on the eve of the fifth anniversary of George Floyd’s murder — the very tragedy that sparked this investigation and the urgent push for reform. Walking away from this agreement, after confirming the need for it, is unconscionable.
The Justice Department is dropping police reform agreements with Louisville and Minneapolis, which came after the killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd
Why do Republicans only talk about fiscal responsibility when it’s about paying for Medicaid and SNAP which helps regular Americans, but not when it’s about giving giant tax breaks to corporations? Seriously hypocritical.
If you talk to a lot of rural hospitals they’ll tell you the same thing: They can’t afford to keep their doors open if that happens. Many of them will close, and that hurts everyone – not just the folks who rely on Medicaid.
Rural hospitals are already squeezed – they can't afford to give out care without some form of payment from insurance companies. So, when our neighbors show up to the ER for care, and they don’t have Medicaid anymore, the hospital has to foot the bill.
I visit rural hospitals all the time. The Republican health care cuts won't just hurt them – they'll force them to close their doors. Patients will lose health insurance, skip getting care because they can't afford it, and then end up in the ER when it becomes too serious to ignore.
Reposted byTina Smith
HASSAN: What is habeas corpus? NOEM: Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country HASSAN: That's incorrect
Just like I thought. In the dead of night (on a Sunday no less) Republicans demanded to kick MORE people off their health insurance FASTER, because their previous proposal didn’t go far enough.
Can't wait to hear the political spin they're going to put on kicking 13 million people off their health insurance. To think this is their "moderate" proposal would be laughable if it wasn't so harmful.
Reposted byTina Smith
Republicans are scheduling votes in the DEAD OF NIGHT on Trump's "big, beautiful bill." They advanced their bill last night at 10:30PM. The next vote is scheduled for 1AM on Wednesday. Why hide? Maybe because this bill rips away health care from babies, new moms, and seniors.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55YESYESPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55YESYESPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55NONOMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)NONOMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →