Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 535
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align92%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 69 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This is basically the good teacher coming in with a grin and saying, "Okay, everybody back to class" after the bad teacher (Tisch) shrieks, "I'm putting you all on double detention!" The quote-posts saying "He's capitulating to fascism!"...some of you really need to adjust your dials.
I’ve seen the videos of kids throwing snowballs at NYPD officers in Washington Square Park. Officers, like all city workers, have been out in a historic blizzard, keeping New Yorkers safe and cars moving. Treat them with respect. If anyone’s catching a snowball, it’s me.
Can't wait to hear a snowball fight described as an urban socialist hellscape of terrifying lawlessness and menace in the fourth hour of the State of the Union tonight.
Officers responding to a planned snowball fight in Washington Square Park were struck by members of the crowd. The NYPD commissioner described the incident as "illegal" and said authorities are investigating.
This is the sequel to Pictures at a Revolution that was most often suggested to me, and I just couldn't find an approach that didn't feel like I was doing the same thing twice.
I had a great time writing the essay for this May Criterion release of a film that was a huge deal in 1974. Today it's less known than its Best Pic Oscar competition (Godfather II! The Conversation! Chinatown! What a year!) but is well worth a revisit or first look. www.criterion.com/films/29151-...
What is the actual complaint here? That the videos are "snappy"? That there are too many of them? That he wore the wrong kind of jacket? That government agencies have emblems? That he's too on top of things? That he got the job--ah, yes, that's the one.
The tone of contempt here, in a news update, is disgraceful. "How dare Mamdani and his team...uh...wear those clothes and use social media to try to prevent bad things from happening when...um...bad things could still happen in a situation like this!" GTFO.
Mayor Zohran Mamdani is again flooding the airwaves and social media with snappy videos of himself in a custom Carhartt jacket, warning New Yorkers to stay safe. He is again holding news conferences at the city’s emergency operations headquarters, surrounded by top aides in outerwear bearing agency emblems. And he is again at the helm of a government operation that, by virtue of its complexity and general unwieldiness, can lend itself to people falling through the cracks.
It's disappointing to see how quickly a lot of people here have pivoted to, "Well, if you have THAT kind of mental illness, do the proper thing and never go out." The movie I SWEAR, about John Davidson's life, opens in the U.S. in April, and it probably can't get here soon enough.
No, I'm sorry, we are not "still on for today," and no, I cannot do a zoom because, uh, the snow broke my zoomer. Best of luck to you and let's circle back in April.
I'm a little tired of the appetite here for "Disqualified!" and "Do better!" and "If you [fill in the blank] you're complicit!" to people who are 90% with you. The number of people on Bluesky who need your policing is possibly lower than some of you imagine.
A lot of Republicans who insist that the system is rigged against people like them have a perverse admiration for people in power who take everything they can get. They tell themselves they'd do the same thing if they had the chance.
The reason we're here is that tens of millions of people will punch a hole in a wall if they hear someone used food stamps to buy soda but they're fine if the right-wing podcaster turned fbi director uses his taxpayer funded private jet to go party whenever he feels like it bsky.app/profile/thed...
Reposted byMark Harris
And sure enough he’s won both. Seek this movie out when it opens in the US in April. Robert deserves an invitation to the Oscars next year.
A note to my fellow awards watchers ahead of the BAFTAs this weekend: Keep an eye on Robert Aramayo from the beautiful drama I Swear. His performance as a man with Tourette’s is spectacular. He’s up for Best Actor and Rising Star and has a shot to win one or both. He’ll be Oscar eligible next year.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
535 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionYESYESPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournNONOFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 11Next →