Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 551
Yes76%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 70 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I like watching them both now that they are solidly in their "Ask your doctor if ___ is right for you" years. The fifties are when male movie actors either decide to get more interesting or they panic and try to stay young. I think they are in general going in the right direction.
I'm watching The Rip. Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are approximately the ages William Holden and Art Carney were when they made The Towering Inferno and Harry and Tonto.
William Holden in The Towering Inferno, looking old AF.
Art Carney in Harry and Tonto, looking like the father of old AF.
It was so whiplashy! An hour of "Anyone can fall in love" followed by an hour of "Come spend time with us and let us demonstrate to you how stupid you are for wanting what you think you want."
NYCers: If you've never had occasion to be at the NYC Marriage Bureau when a bunch of couples are marrying, I recommend it with all my heart. It is one of the most joyous things imaginable and an instant reminder that the city is both unbelievably diverse and bursting with hope and optimism.
Everyone in the world comes to get married at the NYC Marriage Bureau. Last week, the Mayor stopped by to officiate a few of those ceremonies.    Thank you to all the couples who shared their joy with us. Happy Valentine's Day, New York.     Watch the full video at Youtube.com/nycmayorsoffice
But yeah, those who were hired by Trump appointees for mid-level positions at, for instance, HHS, Justice, and Interior are going to have to be looked at very closely in terms of both qualifications and ideological tilt. If they were hired as loyalists (or loyalists of loyalists), well, that's life.
No, "restaffed from the ground up" does not mean "Fire park rangers." But when the fed govt is run by a party opposed to a huge number of its functions, whole structures start to erode or disintegrate. Entire internal divisions have been gutted & will require restaffing. Thus, "from the ground up."
I mean, to offer just one example, the Department of Education is being overseen by people who are ideologically committed to its future nonexistence. So fixing it is going to be much more of an effort than just putting people back at those empty desks and saying "As you were."
I imagine that you've talked, as I have, to people who came into federal agencies after the first four years of Trump and described their initial work as an almost forensic attempt to try to reconstruct what the agency had been when it was properly functioning; it will be much worse this time.
It's not. Rebuilding an agency from the ground up doesn't mean firing every single employee; it means understanding that the damage the Trump administration is doing goes far beyond job elimination and restaffing with boobs and ideologues and deep into areas like infrastructure and record-keeping.
It is not too early for Democrats to build a Project 2028, because if we win, every single agency is going to have to be restaffed and rebuilt from the ground up in the first 100 days, and "We're going to undo the damage" can't be the sole item on our four-year agenda.READ NEXT POST BEFORE REPLYING>
Okay, here's one I don't think anyone's gotten yet (apologies if I missed it): "I've been working since the '30s Selling goddamn hats at Macy's Waiting for the revolution" (Caroline, or Change)
"I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future" = "I, who have never researched anything in my life, yelled 'Find me something!' at either an intern or the woman who brings my snacks."
“There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!”
Trump: The Democrats refuse to vote for Voter I.D., or Citizenship. The reason is very simple — They want to continue to cheat in Elections. This was not what our Founders desired. I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future. There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!
Also, the People of our Country are insisting on Citizenship, and No Mail-In Ballots, with exceptions for Military, Disability, Illness, or Travel. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
465 ReTruths 1.28k Likes
2/13/26, 1:35 PM
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
551 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12