This week Americans exercised their sacred right to vote because they believe in our democracy.
As the administration continues to attack access to the ballot box, it is more important than ever for us to fight to protect voting rights.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes35%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 95 sponsored · 461 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The administration is now APPEALING the court decision requiring it to provide full food assistance to Americans.
There’s no other way to put it: They are doing everything they can to take food away from Americans in need. Shameful.
BREAKING: The Justice Department said it would file an appeal after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration on Thursday to pay food stamps in full this month www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/u...
Voters sent a clear message to Trump on Tuesday: Enough of the costs, chaos, and corruption.
Americans wanted lower costs and instead got skyrocketing health care premiums, golden ballrooms and pardons for Trump’s cronies.
The American people deserve better.
🚨 A judge just ordered the administration to make FULL SNAP payments tomorrow.
As he said, “irreparable harm continues by the minute.”
Congressional Republicans and the President need to come to the table to prevent this health care crisis.
Without the health care tax credits, small businesses owners, ranchers and farmers in Utah and across the country will see their insurance premiums skyrocket.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Republicans’ refusal to fix Pres. Trump’s health care crisis means thousands of RIers are at risk of losing health insurance & thousands more will pay double for the same plan they have now.
@democrats.senate.gov have a solution to lower your costs & reopen the gov’t.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
No, throwing a Great Gatsby-themed party at his gold-plated club while 42 million Americans lose their SNAP benefits isn’t President Trump’s "obligation," Speaker Johnson. It’s just careless.
By refusing to fully fund SNAP, Trump is using hunger as a bargaining chip.
He needs to reverse course and provide SNAP in full so millions of Americans don’t have to wonder where their next meal will come from.
Watch for the hearing today and another court order soon.
House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi is a trailblazer, a fierce fighter for working families and children, and a principled leader. Her service has changed America for the better.
From Texas to Minnesota, millions of hardworking Americans are seeing their health insurance premiums skyrocket. Enough is enough.
The path forward is clear: the President and Congressional Republicans must negotiate in good faith to stop this health crisis.
Just left Supreme Ct, where Justices asked many pointed questions about Trump’s power to (in Roberts’ words) “impose tariffs on any product, from any country, in any amount, for any length of time.”
Trump’s tariff taxes are crushing small businesses and cost families $2K a year.
Trump’s tariff taxes are crushing small business owners like Beth Benike, Minnesota’s Small Business Person of the Year.
We’re fighting back in Congress, in the Courts, and alongside our Constituents.
Headed into the Supreme Court to watch the case on overturning Trump’s reckless tariffs, which are a $2,000 tax on families.
The Justices must follow the Constitution & the law to rule against Trump’s costly power grab.
Tens of millions of Americans – including nearly 1 million North Carolinians – are standing on the edge of a health care premium cliff.
I was joined by State Sen. Gladys Robinson and small business owner Daniel Ayers to discuss why we must prevent premiums from skyrocketing:
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
When talking about Democrats, Trump said, “If they don’t vote, it’s their problem.”
If Trump doesn’t sit down with Democrats and negotiate to reopen the government, he will be the problem for millions of Americans losing their food aid and paying double for health care.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Republicans slashed SNAP and Medicaid in their Big Ugly Bill so they could hand out tax breaks to the wealthiest people in our country, but now refuse to extend health care tax credits so working Americans can afford their health care.
Talk about having the wrong priorities.
The President needs to follow court orders and provide food assistance to veterans, seniors & families in need. His own administration said it would yesterday.
He must comply—and should provide SNAP in full, not just half.
The administration is hiding who is paying for Trump’s gilded ballroom.
And many of the big donors giving Trump money have a reason to … they want the administration’s signoff on their deals.
This is corruption, plain and simple.
NEW: The WH did not disclose several donors to the ballroom who have business before Trump:
▶️Jeff Yass, investor in TikTok parent company: $2.5m+ to ballroom
▶️BlackRock, trying to buy Panama Canal ports: $2.5m+
▶️Extremity Care, Medicare reimbursement issues: $2.5m
▶️Vantive, Medicare reimbursement
I met Christi, a small business owner from Eagan whose employee, a cancer survivor, is seeing his family’s health costs rise by $400 a month.
Christi helps pay for his premiums, doing everything she can to keep him insured. This is who we’re fighting for.
The courts have ordered the administration to use its contingency fund for SNAP—and have made clear it can use its transfer authorities to fully fund SNAP.
It is not enough to do the bare minimum—they should do everything they can to ensure Americans put food on the table.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (46-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S. 1582 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31) |
| 2025-05-19 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-05-15 | S. Res. 195 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-05-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.