Teyana Gibson Brown came home after her night shift in the pediatric ICU only to be awakened by ICE agents barging into her home without a warrant and illegally detaining her husband.
ICE completely trampled on the rights of Minnesotans. It must stop.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes33%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 87 sponsored · 402 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Honored to meet with the Disabled American Veterans of Minnesota. Their courage and service continue to inspire, and it was meaningful to hear directly about the challenges they face.
Minnesota will always stand with our veterans.
Jeremy’s story is all too common in rural America: After congressional Republicans refused to extend the health care tax credits, his insurance costs increased 288%—an $11,000 jump. Now he skips his own care to cover his wife’s treatments.
These are choices no one should have to make.
The administration's tariffs have hurt Minnesota farmers—drying up markets and raising the cost of inputs for family farms.
www.startribune.com/supreme-cour...
Fact: In a one hour and 47 minute speech, the President only spent 2.9 minutes on affordability and 3.8 minutes on health care.
As this whistleblower shared, ICE cut hours of firearm safety and protester rights training. These agents must follow standards we expect our local law enforcement to abide by – that’s the bare minimum.
Higher prices and more uncertainty, with the American people paying the price.
Instead of working to lower costs for Americans, the Administration is doubling down and continuing to push more tariffs — hurting our small businesses, farmers, and our economy in the process.
A judge rejected Live Nation-Ticketmaster’s bid to dismiss the Justice Department’s monopoly case.
That means fans, artists, and independent venues are one day closer to getting their day in court.
www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/live-nation-...
GOLD FOR TEAM USA! 🇺🇸🥇🏒
An INCREDIBLE overtime win with an unforgettable finish. First gold medal in Men's Hockey since the 1980 Miracle on Ice!
Good to see so many gathered at Pheasant Fest to celebrate the work of Pheasants Forever. Their leadership in protecting habitat and expanding public access keeps Minnesota’s outdoor traditions strong — and I’m proud to support those efforts.
It was an honor to receive an axe from St. Paul Professional Firefighters Local 21. I was surrounded by heroes who put their lives on the line everyday to help others. I’ll keep working to honor the memory of Mike Paidar and ensure our firefighters get the support they deserve.
These sweeping tariffs hurt small businesses, dried up markets for our farmers, and raised costs for families by an estimated $1,700.
It is time to bring down costs and put our economy back on track, not hit our country with even more tariffs.
The President calling Supreme Court Justices “unpatriotic” and “influenced by foreign powers”—simply for upholding the Constitution and the law in the tariffs decision is dangerous and wrong.
These reckless attacks on an independent judiciary undermine the rule of law.
Today, the Supreme Court finally affirmed what I have been saying for a year: the Administration's reckless tariffs are illegal.
Sen. Murkowski and I passed a bill to strengthen the National Firefighter Cancer Registry. Now over 43,000 enrollees—the highest ever—are helping to track and advance protection against occupational cancers for firefighters.
Loved spending time with our state office interns. They have supported our constituents during a really difficult time. Their commitment to taking care of their neighbors and eagerness to learn make me excited for the future of our state.
GOLD for the USA! 🇺🇸🥇
Congratulations to the U.S. Women’s Hockey Team, with so many Minnesotans leading the way — including Taylor Heise with the game-winning assist in overtime! 🏒
After the assassination of Melissa Hortman and the horrific shooting at Annunciation, federal officials worked alongside state law enforcement to investigate. Now, the DOJ is stonewalling and refusing to share information in the Alex Pretti case. They must reverse course.
Jeremy Tischer is a third-generation Minnesota farmer growing corn, soybeans, and sugar beets in Breckenridge.
Family farmers like Jeremy need certainty and stability. That's why I'm pushing to repeal the harmful tariffs and expand year-round E-15.
www.inforum.com/news/minneso...
Gold medal game today for the U.S. Women’s Hockey Team! 🇺🇸🏒
With so many Minnesotans leading the way, I can’t wait to cheer them on as they go for gold.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.