Tim Kaine headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Virginia
Born
1958
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-4024
Office
231 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Virginia

Tim Kaine

Timothy Michael Kaine is an American lawyer and politician serving as the junior United States senator from Virginia since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 70th governor of Virginia from 2006 to 2010, and as the 38th lieutenant governor of Virginia from 2002 to 2006. Kaine was the Democratic nominee for Vice President of the United States in the 2016 election as Hillary Clinton's running mate.

Voting Record — 789
Yes37%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tim Kaine headshot
Tim Kaine
U.S. SenatorDemocratVirginia
SoupScore
Tim's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 75 sponsored · 337 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I heard from local farmers and agricultural stakeholders in Loudoun County about President Trump’s proposed tariffs and the uncertainty of federal funding. We also discussed the farm bill and immigration. I’m grateful for their views, which will help me advocate for them better in the Senate.
Senator Kaine sits at a roundtable with others.
My heart aches for the Virginians impacted by the destructive flooding in SW. @markwarner.bsky.social and I wrote the Administration urging the approval of Virginia’s expedited Major Disaster Declaration to quickly get these communities the help they need.
Page one of the letter.
Page two of the letter.
At a time when President Trump is flirting with tariffs that could crush America's farmers, we need a Secretary of Agriculture who understands those communities. Not a right-wing think tank CEO. That's why I voted no on Brooke Rollins' nomination yesterday.
I was just briefed by the National Transportation Safety Board, which is investigating the tragic crash near DCA. We are determined to get to the bottom of what happened. Congress and the Admin owe it to the families impacted by this disaster work together to ensure this never happens again.
In 1959, Mildred Loving and her husband Richard were convicted under Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage. The Lovings waged a historic legal battle for their right to be married and won in the 1967 Loving v. Virginia SCOTUS decision, ending interracial marriage bans in every state.
A black and white photo of Mildred Loving sitting on a couch.
RFK, Jr. can't tell the difference between fact and conspiracy, won't take sides on 9/11, and has challenged established medical science. He's one of the worst appointees ever confirmed by the Senate. I'll do all I can to provide oversight through my work on the Senate health committee.
The Senate confirmed RFK Jr. as HHS secretary, putting a longtime critic of vaccines and the medical establishment in charge of U.S. health policy https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/rfk-jr-senate-confirmation-vote-trump-hhs-secretary-d4ad51df?mod=bluesky
Instead, he has flirted with tariffs that will raise costs and rolled back steps to lower Rx drug costs. Now he’s focused on tax cuts for billionaires at the expense of working Americans.
Trump’s slashing the federal workforce. Who does it hurt? 30% are veterans! (Private workforce is only 5% veterans.) President attacking vets? No surprise since he called them “losers.” I'm pushing back! www.nbcnews.com/politics/dog...
I presented an amendment to protect student loan forgiveness for public servants—including teachers, firefighters, and nurses—from cuts. These are the benefits they were promised, and Congress should keep its word. Republicans blocked it.
Next, I pushed for an amendment to make permanent a tax fix that helps make health care more affordable for 5 million Americans. Republicans blocked it.
Next, I pushed for an amendment to make permanent a tax fix that helps make health care more affordable for 5 million Americans. Republicans blocked it.
I’ve been be here all day, pushing for amendments to improve their bill. First up: I proposed an amendment to require experts to estimate the impacts Republicans’ cuts will have on health insurance coverage. Republicans blocked it.
I’ve been be here all day, pushing for amendments to improve their bill. First up: I proposed an amendment to require experts to estimate the impacts Republicans’ cuts will have on health insurance coverage. Republicans blocked it.
It’s a big day on the Budget Committee. Senate Republicans kicked off a process to pass a budget without any Democratic votes. Their goal is simple: to dramatically cut programs that affect every day Virginians, while tariffs raise costs and billionaires get tax cuts.
It’s a big day on the Budget Committee. Senate Republicans kicked off a process to pass a budget without any Democratic votes. Their goal is simple: to dramatically cut programs that affect every day Virginians, while tariffs raise costs and billionaires get tax cuts.
I’m glad to see Virginia make progress in passing legislation that closely models what I’ve advocated for at the federal level. This is a big step forward toward protecting students’ mental health and academic performance. dailyprogress.com/news/state-r...
Delayed access to funds following Trump’s illegal federal funding freeze puts rural folks’ health, safety, and economic stability on the line. I’m using every tool at my disposal to rectify this and help health clinics in SW continue to operate. cardinalnews.org/2025/02/10/h...
Advocacy can still work. Following my urging, the Trump Administration is ending the hiring freeze for National Park Service law enforcement rangers and public safety dispatchers. I know this far from fixes everything, but this is an important sign that, together, we can enact change.
Trump’s NPS hiring freeze paves the way for a damaging loss of staff at national parks—threatening emergency response times, park safety, and local economies in Virginia. I’m urging the Trump Administration to reverse course and protect our parks.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-04End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55YESYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-08S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 16Next →