Zoe Lofgren headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 18
Born
December 21, 1947
Age 78
Phone
(202) 225-3072
Office
1401 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 18

Zoe Lofgren

Susan Ellen "Zoe" Lofgren is an American politician and lawyer serving as a U.S. representative from California. A member of the Democratic Party, Lofgren is in her 15th term in Congress, having been first elected in 1994. Lofgren has long served on the House Judiciary Committee, and chaired the House Administration Committee in the 116th and 117th Congresses.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 18

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Zoe Lofgren headshot
Zoe Lofgren
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 18
SoupScore
Zoe's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 110 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Today, on #WearOrange Day, I honor the countless lives taken by gun violence each year & to keep close those impacted by this preventable crisis. I stand united against gun violence & recommit to saving lives & keeping our communities safe.
I joined my colleagues @dorismatsui.bsky.social & @repjimcosta.bsky.social in demanding that the National Weather Service (@nws.noaa.gov) Sacramento and Hanford offices return to their full capacity. Staffing cuts puts constituents directly at risk; it is irresponsible & immoral. bit.ly/4ktaZPI
Hazard mitigation saves lives & saves money for the government in the long run by preventing disasters. My colleagues across the aisle and in the Senate agree. @usrepjimmypanetta.bsky.social @padilla.senate.gov @schiff.senate.gov, Rep. David Valadao bit.ly/4dGsR74
ICYMI – I joined @lastword.msnbc.com to discuss the limits on judicial power of contempt in the GOP Budget Bill. Preventing the Trump Administration from being held accountable for violating court orders is despicable. Watch here ⤵️ youtu.be/mQ2MxaxPwxw
The GOP’s budget proposal puts billionaires above everyday families. Republicans have a choice: stop these devastating cuts or fail the people they claim to serve.
In CA alone, over 5 million people, including over 100 thousand veterans & 1.5 million children, receive SNAP benefits to help put food on the table. Republican proposals to cut SNAP funding would hurt our families, our veterans, & our economy.
I met with the RCRC & Supervisor Lopez about how essential Medicaid is for Labor & Delivery & rural healthcare. Republicans’ proposed Medicaid cuts would increase the number of people without health insurance by at least 8.6 million.
Today, with my colleagues, Reps. Dan Newhouse, Mike Simpson, Jim Costa, David Valadao, & Adam Gray, I reintroduced the Farm Workforce Modernization Act. As labor shortages contribute to high food prices, it is even more essential that we stabilize our country’s workforce. Read more: bit.ly/434WcTL
← Newer postsPosts page 26
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 1039 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-07H.R. 586 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H.R. 1491 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passagePRESENTNOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 10Next →