Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

May we remember the unity, compassion, and resilience of our nation in those days, particularly as we face deep divisions and difficult times.
Today marks 24 years since nearly 3,000 lives were lost on September 11, 2001. We honor the first responders, servicemembers, and ordinary Americans who sacrificed so much in the days and years that followed.
The attack on Charlie Kirk is horrific and disgusting. Violence has no place in American politics. We can debate fiercely and disagree passionately, but we must always resolve our differences peacefully and with basic respect for one another.
Trump’s approval is stuck underwater, but here’s the real headline: 78% of Americans support vaccines. While Trump and RFK Jr. undermine science, the vast majority know vaccines save lives—and want leaders who respect facts.
Trump’s attacks on the Fed aren’t just reckless—they’re dangerous. Even business leaders who once supported him are warning this could fuel higher inflation and higher long-term rates. I’ve heard the same from leaders here at home. This won’t end well.
Don't forget: Republicans claim they didn’t gut Medicaid—just added “accountability,” and that’s a LIE. Their Big Ugly Bill slashes $1 trillion, imposes harsh red tape, and creates chaos that will push millions off their coverage. All to fund a billionaire tax break.
At a time when we need leaders rooted in truth and science, Kennedy is fueling chaos and putting lives at risk. We cannot normalize this behavior. RFK Jr. must resign.
Even Kennedy’s own family has said it plainly: his leadership is a danger to the health and well-being of every American.
The damage is not abstract. Since Trump empowered Kennedy at HHS, nearly $3.8 billion in NIH research grants have been terminated. That means fewer clinical trials, fewer cures, and less hope for families facing cancer and other diseases.
In his Senate testimony last week, he spread dangerous conspiracy theories about vaccines, promoted junk science, and sowed distrust in our public health institutions.
Trump is again trying to ignore the Constitution by refusing to spend money Congress already passed into law. The courts have said it’s illegal. Article I gives Congress the power of the purse—NOT the president. This cannot stand. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
The U.S. economy added just 22,000 jobs in August—the weakest growth since the pandemic era, with sectors like manufacturing and federal employment shrinking. We fought hard to rebuild after 2020. Families can’t afford to go backward. #Trumpflation
Social Security isn’t a game. But DOGE turned it into one—gutting expertise, spreading chaos, and putting earned benefits at risk. Americans pay in their whole lives. It’s a promise, not a playground, and it must be protected. www.propublica.org/article/insi...
Don't forget: Republicans claim they didn’t gut Medicaid—just added “accountability,” and that’s a LIE. Their Big Ugly Bill slashes $1 trillion, imposes harsh red tape, and creates chaos that will push millions off their coverage. All to fund a billionaire tax break.
Reposted byMike Levin
RFK Jr. just said he sees “no successes” in the very health agencies he runs. That’s absurd. The CDC helped eradicate smallpox, combat HIV/AIDS, cut smoking, and save millions of lives with vaccines. Undermining that legacy doesn’t protect Americans—it puts us all at risk.
Americans were promised relief by Trump and Republicans, but families are still feeling the squeeze. Where are rising costs hitting you and your family the hardest?
RFK Jr. just said he sees “no successes” in the very health agencies he runs. That’s absurd. The CDC helped eradicate smallpox, combat HIV/AIDS, cut smoking, and save millions of lives with vaccines. Undermining that legacy doesn’t protect Americans—it puts us all at risk.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Supreme Court just let Trump’s ICE “roving patrols” resume in LA. Justice Sotomayor is right: countless people—citizens included—are being seized and humiliated simply for how they look or speak. That’s unconstitutional, and it’s wrong.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 11Next →