H.R. 1047 (119th)Bill Overview

Guaranteeing Reliability through the Interconnection of Dispatchable Power Act

Energy|Electric power generation and transmissionEnergy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Feb 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill directs FERC to open a rulemaking within 90 days to reform interconnection queue rules so transmission providers can propose prioritizing new "dispatchable power" projects that improve grid reliability and resource adequacy.

It requires transmission providers to demonstrate need, allow public comment, report on grid reliability, and gives FERC 60 days to approve or deny proposals, with a final rule due within 180 days and a regulatory review at least every five years.

Passage40/100

Content is narrow and administratively focused, raising moderate chance, but Senate approval and stakeholder/legal pushback are key hurdles.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention65/100

Whether prioritization will lock in fossil infrastructure versus clean firm resources

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersPrioritizing dispatchable projects may accelerate interconnection, improving short-term grid reliability and resource a…
  • Targeted stakeholdersQuicker dispatchable additions may lower outage-related economic losses and reduce blackout risks.
  • Targeted stakeholdersClarified prioritization could attract investment and construction jobs for dispatchable generation and storage.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersAllowing queue reordering risks undermining first-come, first-served interconnection fairness.
  • Targeted stakeholdersBroad dispatchable definition could favor fossil fuel plants, potentially increasing greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpedited approval timelines may increase litigation or market disputes over prioritization decisions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether prioritization will lock in fossil infrastructure versus clean firm resources
Progressive35%

Skeptical but conditional.

Supports reliability and modernizing queues, but worries prioritization could favor fossil fuels over clean resources.

Would seek safeguards to ensure prioritized projects reduce emissions and that storage and non-emitting dispatchable resources qualify.

Likely resistant
Centrist75%

Generally favorable.

Values clearer interconnection rules, transparency, and faster decisions to address resource adequacy.

Worries about rushed approvals, cost allocation, and legal challenges, so would favor careful technical implementation and stakeholder processes.

Leans supportive
Conservative85%

Supportive.

Emphasizes the need to prioritize dispatchable capacity for reliability and resilience.

Views the bill as reducing interconnection delays and empowering transmission providers to address shortages quickly, though expects efficient, market-aligned implementation.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Content is narrow and administratively focused, raising moderate chance, but Senate approval and stakeholder/legal pushback are key hurdles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or agency workload impact provided
  • Ambiguity in criteria for "dispatchable" prioritization
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether prioritization will lock in fossil infrastructure versus clean firm resources

Content is narrow and administratively focused, raising moderate chance, but Senate approval and stakeholder/legal pushback are key hurdles.

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for Guaranteeing Reliability through the Interconnection of Dispat…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis