$8 million in approved funding is available to keep supporting the Ukraine Conflict Observatory – a program that tracks children from Ukraine kidnapped by Putin.
So why hasn’t it been disbursed? We sent a letter to Sec Rubio asking why and if there’s a plan. More here👇🏼
www.cnn.com/2025/06/11/p...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes48%
No51%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 136 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Congressional Republicans are working to cut billions in funding for children and families here and all over the world.
Kids will die if they pass this.
We discuss the details, if they have the votes, and more in this week’s episode of The Fly-In👇🏼
It does. At least $2.4 trillion.
Had a great visit from the Avondale Youth Council.
My favorite days in the Capitol are visits from SW Ohio students spending time learning about our nation’s history.
Their bill strips healthcare from 16M people. It pulls $1T from the healthcare system.
When you do that, hospitals will close and doctors will shutter their doors.
All of that pain and suffering is so the super wealthy and big corporations can get their tax cuts.
Kill the bill.
I have a new piece out about how the House reconciliation bill will harm rural households.
Not only will it rural folks lose health coverage & food access, hospitals are more likely to close and businesses will struggle.
All for a tax cut skewed towards the wealthy.
www.cbpp.org/research/fed...
Congratulations to the Lebanon High School softball team for becoming State Champions for the first time in its program's history! What an accomplishment!
You make SW Ohio so proud 🙏🏼💙
www.wcpo.com/sports/high-...
I would encourage my colleagues to stop politicizing this, on both sides. Our safety and wellbeing are at stake, and antisemitism should be a nonpartisan, non-controversial issue.
The fact that it’s not says a lot.
Here’s an example that may help:
There are 100,000 Jews in Australia. Antisemitism is surging there, too. If they get kicked out, they only have one place they can go. Israel. That’s it. We’re not taking 100,000 Jews from Australia, nor is any other country. Except Israel.
I also push on Israel because I need it to succeed. Jews need a Jewish state. That is non-negotiable. Nearly all Jews live in two places - here and Israel. That’s not by choice.
I criticize Israel when I think the government is making mistakes. I do so in part because I desperately want to be part of a generation of leaders that finally achieves a durable peace for everyone in the Middle East - Israelis, Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, etc.
I’m a pro-Israel Jew who criticizes Israel, as we all do. I sometimes fly to Israel to be sure I look the Prime Minister in the eye and tell him my frustrations and disagreements with decisions he’s made. I believe it has had an impact.
Denying Jews self-determination, or anti-Zionism, is wrong. Denying Palestinians self-determination is also wrong, and why most pro-Israel advocates are also pro-Palestinian.
It’s the folks who believe that only one group deserves security and freedom that is problematic.
It’s so important for Marjorie Taylor Greene to maintain this blood libel, and to do so without consequences, that she opposes this bill.
Some on the Left suggest that the legislation prohibits criticism of Israel.
It does not.
Whether any of us want to admit it, antisemitism is alive and well all across the political spectrum – and across the world.
Some on the Right like to spread the lie that Jews killed Jesus, which is the kind of blood libel that gets Jews killed.
Anti-Zionism is different from being critical of the Israeli government. Anti-Zionism is the position that Israel should not be allowed to exist as a Jewish State.
Israelis criticize their government and, unlike so many other countries in the Middle East, are allowed to protest their government openly.
The bill allows for criticism of policies or actions of the Israeli government, which is exactly how it should be.
The bill requires colleges to use this definition in building out trainings and teachings that help to combat antisemitism. That’s it. It doesn’t punish any speech or stop anyone from being hateful.
It uses the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition for antisemitism but nowhere in the bill does it punish people for this antisemitism.
Here is a quick summary of the definition, which I hope folks read.
holocaustremembrance.com/resources/wo...)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.