Greg Landsman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Ohio District 1
Born
December 4, 1976
Age 49
Phone
(202) 225-2216
Office
2244 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1

Greg Landsman

Gregory John Landsman is an American politician who has been the U.S. representative from Ohio's 1st congressional district since 2023. The district is based in Cincinnati, and includes most of its inner suburbs.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 581
Yes49%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Greg Landsman headshot
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 138 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Prescription drug costs are too high, especially for seniors on fixed incomes. Today, we introduced our bipartisan Saving Seniors Money on Prescriptions Act with Representative Harshbarger to hold PBMs accountable, lower out-of-pocket costs, and save seniors millions.
Saving Seniors Money on Prescriptions Act with a photo of Greg with seniors
It’s been 2 years since the East Palestine train derailment. We will again support the RAIL Act, a bipartisan bill to provide comprehensive 21st-century railway safety regulations. This bill should have passed last Congress. We owe it to the community of East Palestine. www.npr.org/2025/02/03/g...
Republicans in Congress will have reliable partners with us, but they have the power to bring legislation to the floor. It’s time for them to step up and assure the American people that our democracy is still intact; that our elected officials will protect the American people.
Trump’s trade wars alone will cost the American people and American businesses significantly. Life is about to get even more expensive for folks. The data breach and Musk and his team having access to our data and every federal account puts everyone at risk - Republicans, Democrats, Independents.
Republicans in Congress will have reliable partners with us, but they have the power to bring legislation to the floor. It’s time for them to step up and assure the American people that our democracy is still intact; that our elected officials will protect the American people.
Trump’s trade wars alone will cost the American people and American businesses significantly. Life is about to get even more expensive for folks. The data breach and Musk and his team having access to our data and every federal account puts everyone at risk - Republicans, Democrats, Independents.
Schools are trying to figure out if they can even teach Black history. That Trump & too many Rs are going to take their money if they do. Let’s start Black History Month letting that sink in. If there are 2 genders, will they declare there is 1 race? Or have they already? 🤷🏼‍♂️
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
581 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 12Next →