
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 37 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Meeting our nation's housing needs means we need to move fast. In San Jose, we proved that manufactured, prefab homes can help us move faster. The SUPPLY Act will finally allow federally backed, flexible financing for ADUs like the one behind me.
Today, I introduced the SUPPLY Act with Rep. Andrew Garbarino. Our legislation empowers homeowners to be a part of the solution to our housing crisis. Read more in this piece in @wsj.com.
www.wsj.com/economy/hous...
Congress holds the power of the purse for a reason: we’re the branch closest to the people. This rescissions package hands that power to Trump, giving him carte blanche to slash critical programs.
buff.ly/qX0Bgz7
Read more about the fight to protect Chavez's legacy in the @sanjosespotlight.com.
sanjosespotlight.com/san-jose-law...
Congratulations to Portola Valley’s own Alpine Little League for clinching the Section 3 championship! We know you’ll make us proud in the Northern California Little League tournament–keep swinging! ⚾ ⚾
Only 1 in 4 families who qualify for federal housing assistance actually receive it. Investing in the HOME program and solutions to build our supply will help close that gap.
When I was Mayor of San Jose, The HOME program wasn't enough to meet our city's housing needs. Cutting it now, as Trump proposes, would be a step backward in the fight to solve our housing crisis.
Without the CFPB, who will protect American consumers?
This is not a partisan matter, it’s American; all of us benefit from Cesar Chavez’s legacy of service, social justice, and leadership. @cisneros.house.gov @hispaniccaucus.bsky.social
America needs an innovation agenda to win the 21st century. In my new op-ed with
@mercurynews.com, I outline how we will rise to the challenge.
www.mercurynews.com/2025/07/15/l...
ICYMI: Here's what I've been up to over the past week.
I met with Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia and an old friend, on the day that it was announced that Nvidia achieved a milestone valuation. Safe to say, he was all smiles.
Great read about how programs like Cascade Regenerator and Rancho San Benito are helping leaders like Maria Zavala build thriving businesses and reshape the future of local agriculture.
This is an epidemic of lawlessness from this administration. The 14th Amendment is clear, affirmed by eight federal judges and the Supreme Court 127 years ago. Yet, they continue to push unconstitutional executive orders and terrorize communities.
Our natural spaces are among our nation’s greatest treasures, and we have a responsibility to preserve them for future generations.
July is National Parks and Recreation Month—a time to celebrate the public lands that make America extraordinary. My bill to protect Scarper Ridge as part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area will secure a place for our community in the National Park System.
The fact that there's a false conspiracy being propagated by this administration's attorney general is a feature, not a bug.
San Jose’s own Asian Americans for Community Involvement was awarded a $438,000 grant from HHS to expand its behavioral health workforce. The funding will help train culturally competent mental health professionals to better serve our community and fill critical gaps in care.
We must stand together as Americans to fight for and protect our fellow citizens from having their citizenship stripped by Trump’s unlawful order.
157 years ago today, the 14th Amendment was ratified—enshrining the promise of citizenship for all born on U.S. soil, a promise upheld by the Supreme Court since 1898. States now prepare to challenge Trump's unconstitutional executive order.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-23 | H.R. 5587 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 6387 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1182 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | S. 1020 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 2493 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 5201 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 5200 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 1681 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 1156 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 1689 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Con. Res. 40 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 7613 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 1011 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 10Next →