Sam T. Liccardo headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 16
Born
April 16, 1970
Age 56
Phone
(202) 225-8104
Office
1117 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16

Sam T. Liccardo

Samuel Theodore Liccardo is an American attorney and politician currently serving as the U.S. representative from California's 16th congressional district. Previously, he served as the 65th mayor of San Jose from 2015 to 2023. A member of the Democratic Party, Liccardo was elected mayor in November 2014. He was reelected in 2018 with 75.8% of the vote. As the leader of the California Big City Mayors Coalition, Liccardo advocated on statewide issues including homelessness and COVID-19 response.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 16

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sam T. Liccardo headshot
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 37 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Thank you, Supervisor Ray Mueller, for convening a gathering of local officials and staff at Ludicken’s in Menlo Park to foster relationships and learn more about the issues facing San Mateo County.
We’re going to fight to protect Medicaid. We're not going to fidget, fluctuate, or fumble, and we certainly won't fade. We're going to fight to stop Donald Trump and Elon Musk from cutting your healthcare to cover billionaire tax cuts they don’t know how to pay for.
Instead, Trump and the majority in Congress have hiked tariffs, proposed cuts to Medicaid, and slashed housing and veterans programs. We–both Republicans and Democrats—must focus our legislative energy on helping families pay their bills. 2/2
Last November, millions of American families struggling with the rising cost of living told us what they care about at the polls. This Administration has done nothing to address those burdens. 1/2
Great visit with the 63rd Readiness Division — we discussed how we can use federal land to increase the supply of affordable housing for families at the base and beyond.
Rise up all green people! San Jose’s Shamrock Run raises ~green~ to fund scholarships for local SJSU students to participate in educational exchange with our I sister city of Dublin. I had a great time wishing all of the leprechauns, lads and lassies luck before the race.
Regeneron Science Talent Search and Westmont High School student Yash Ranjith visited our office this week. Yash developed a groundbreaking neural network that improves the ability of health and safety experts to predict pollution spread. Congratulations, Yash! #Innovation4Good.
Raul Grijalva was a steadfast champion for environmental justice and protecting our nation’s treasured natural resources — always building stronger communities in the process. May his memory be a blessing.
Although the GOP majority controls both houses of Congress, they still lack the votes to pass their budget resolution this week - a budget that would have pushed 32,000 families into the street and cut veterans' health care because they never negotiated with Democrats.
I didn’t come to Congress to withhold veterans' benefits, worsen our homelessness crisis, and participate in the Republicans’ scheme to abdicate Constitutional budgetary authority to a President who has demonstrated unprecedented recklessness with the lives and livelihoods of the American people.
If the last 6 weeks have taught us anything, it’s that this President needs less power, not more. Donald Trump and Elon Musk won’t abide by Congress’s funding bills, so why would we give them a blank check? So, I’m voting NO on the spending stopgap.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11