My constituents want to know why an unelected billionaire donor had accessed their sensitive information.
We sought answers for them.
www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rc...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 232 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As I told them in committee, the only thing my amendment would do is allow the Inspector General to do their job.
As elected officials, I do not understand how Republicans in Congress are fine giving up their oversight powers. (3/3)
WATCH⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=waYu...
My amendment, which you can read at this link, would have addressed the concerns members of Congress, including Republicans, are rightly hearing from our constituents. (2/3)
gwenmoore.house.gov/uploadedfile...
While I'm glad to see this audit, I am dismayed that my Republican colleagues ❌BLOCKED❌ my amendment in committee this week that would have required the Treasury Inspector General to monitor all of DOGE’s activities and report findings to Congress. (1/3)
apnews.com/article/trea...
It’s been a busy few weeks in D.C, and as we recess to go back to our districts for a few days, I want to emphasize to my constituents that I see you. I hear you. And I will keep working for you.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ5D...
Donald Trump is Elon Musk’s true love
House Republicans are working on legislation to enact MASSIVE cuts to Medicaid and SNAP to pay for the Trump Tax Scam 2.0.
The GOP’s budget isn’t about “fiscal responsibility”—it’s about robbing the poor to pay the rich.
🔪ON THE GOP CHOPPING BLOCK: Programs that keep Americans afloat.
And for what? Trillions in tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and corporations.
This is a direct attack on working families, children, and seniors.
Hey, GOP! I found some of that 'waste, fraud, and abuse' you've tasked Elon Musk with finding!
www.npr.org/2025/02/13/g...
🚨HAPPENING NOW:
Republicans are marking up their budget to make deep cuts to Medicaid and SNAP -- all while promising to enact the Trump Tax Scam 2.0.
Don't let them do it behind closed doors.
WATCH ⬇️⬇️⬇️
www.c-span.org/event/house-...
ICYMI: Republicans revealed a budget plan today to lift the debt limit and spend $4.5 TRILLION in tax cuts for wealthy Americans and corporations.
So much for the party of fiscal responsibility.
apnews.com/article/hous...
Elon Musk’s idea of transparency is posting on X.
We are demanding answers on what DOGE plans to do with sensitive taxpayer information so they can’t arbitrarily decide things like who gets their tax returns and who gets their Social Security payments.
All members of Congress swore allegiance to the Constitution. They didn't ask just Democrats to defend America against all enemies.
The house is on fire, y'all. I'll do everything I can to extinguish that flame, but I am begging my Republican colleagues to remember their oath.
When used strategically, tariffs can protect jobs & industries from unfair competition.
But Trump's reckless across the board tariffs would slam Wisconsin industries—raising costs for breweries, manufacturers & farmers. A bad deal for the Badger State.
www.cbs58.com/news/a-clear...
It's no secret why Elon Musk promised to 'delete' the CFPB, and why Donald Trump is giving him the green light.
Less oversight and transparency of consumer financial products = easier for Elon Musk to get richer.
www.bloomberg.com/news/feature...
What they say: “Work requirements (for SNAP & Medicaid) can be adjusted depending on how big of a funding gap they need to fill”
What it means: “Tax cuts for billionaires will be paid for by cutting struggling Americans access to food assistance & health care“
www.politico.com/news/2025/02...
🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.