Our dedicated caseworkers have worked nonstop with this woman’s family, her attorney, ICE, and Mexican officials to prevent her illegal deportation. And we’ll continue until her rights are upheld.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Jersey District 8
Robert Menendez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes42%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Robert Menendez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Jersey District 8
SoupScore
Robert's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 50 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
When she courageously pleaded her case, the Mexican government rightly told ICE that they would not accept her. Now, she’s back in Texas, and her family and loved ones are concerned for her wellbeing.
In the middle of the night, she was loaded on a bus in TX and driven across the border to MEXICO - a country she has no ties to. She alleges that ICE officials threatened her with violence if she did not sign a voluntary departure form.
This constituent, a victim of unspeakable torture and abuse in Colombia, had been granted legal protections under the Convention Against Torture, meaning that she couldn’t be sent back to her home country.
Last night, ICE attempted to deport a constituent who had been granted legal protections against removal. This is an egregious and illegal overstep by ICE. Here’s what happened, and why it matters 🧵
Strongest signal that Trump doesn’t believe Johnson can hold the Republicans’ slight majority and divided conference together. Sending in reinforcements to keep the faint hope of reconciliation alive. The problem? GOP’s proposals like cutting healthcare are unpopular no matter who is in charge.
Commercial refrigerators or affordable childcare?
Walk-in freezers or affordable housing?
The difference in priorities between Republicans and Democrats couldn’t be starker.
So I went to the House Floor to talk about it 👇
Equal work deserves equal pay, full stop.
On #EqualPayDay, I'm proud to join the fight with @delauro.house.gov and the @demwomencaucus.bsky.social to finally pass the Paycheck Fairness Act.
Today on @energycommerce.bsky.social, we tackled rising energy costs, safeguarding the IRA and the challenges we're facing in strengthening our energy infrastructure. One thing that's not helping? President Trump's disruptive approach to governing. Watch 👇
I went to the House Floor to speak about the GOP’s dangerous attack on our judiciary. Watch 👇
Concerned about this mishandling of classified info? Me too. Important thread from @slotkin.senate.gov below 👇
Bottom line: don’t buy Trump and the GOP’s BS. The courts are an essential check on power - even when we disagree with their rulings. What Trump is doing is NOT normal and we will not treat it as such. We will keep the guardrails on and fight against every attempt to dismantle them.
So what has changed? The Republican Party is COMPLETELY beholden to Trump and his attempt to upend the rule of law. That’s why Republicans are threatening the impeachment of judges. But we won’t stand for it.
To be clear, BOTH Dem and GOP AGs have taken administrations of the opposite party to court. That’s ok - see separation of powers point above. And don’t like a decision? You can appeal it.
Texas AG Paxton even “celebrated” having filed his 100th lawsuit against the Biden Administration. Sen. Cruz said of GOP AGs “their work is important and much needed."
Here’s the hypocrisy: by the end of Biden’s term, his Administration had faced 133 multi-state lawsuits filed by GOP Attorneys General.
And while Trump has repeatedly attacked federal judges who ruled against him, calling for their impeachment is unprecedented and EXTREMELY dangerous.
The separation of powers is the cornerstone of our democracy. Both Democratic and Republican AGs have challenged executive actions in court. This has become increasingly common during the era of Obama, Trump 1.0 and Biden.
Democratic AGs have been successful in filing suits against the Trump Administration. So how do Trump and his Republican allies respond? They attack federal judges. Here’s why it’s not only problematic but also highlights their shameless hypocrisy. 🧵
We need to continue to invest in our public education system and meet the challenges of the moment. It’s hard work but we can - and MUST - do it. Let’s get it done!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.