I applaud DC for taking legal action to end the president's unlawful attempt to seize control of MPD.
On the same day DC is asserting its rights in court, I introduced legislation with my colleagues to end this egregious and unlawful federalization.
DC is united in our resistance.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|District of Columbia at-large
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 61
Yes15%
No74%
Present0%
Not Voting12%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
At-Large District
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Eleanor Holmes Norton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratDistrict of Columbia at-large
SoupScore
Eleanor Holmes's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 97 sponsored · 1030 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
No emergency exists in DC that the president did not create himself, and he is not using MPD for federal purposes, as required by law.
I introduced legislation with RM Raskin, RM Garcia, & Senator Van Hollen to end the unlawful and unprecedented federalization of MPD.
I love the spirit of DC. Its people are passionate, we are involved, and we speak up loudly when we've been wronged.
Nothing and no one can convince us we don't deserve all the rights and privileges of Americans who happen to live across a state line.
MPD is funded by local DC taxpayers. I will not allow a bill to progress that would force DC to fund a local police force for the president to use indefinitely. Rep. Ogles' bill is yet another extreme attack on DC home rule. This will not stand.
President Trump fabricated the “emergency” that’s required to exist for a president to federalize DC Police, and he admitted to reporters today that he’s willing to fabricate a national emergency in order to try to extend his power.
Thank you, Senator Schumer, for making clear Senate Dems will block any request to extend this anti-home rule attack on DC.
Lacking senators ourselves, DC is fortunate to have Senator Schumer’s staunch support of #DCStatehood and home rule.
Senator, thank you for having DC’s back.
In recent days I've relentlessly supported Mayor Bowser and DC during a period of unprecedented federal incursion.
But working with civic associations, other DC groups, the CBC and rallying my colleagues in Congress is only the start.
We'll get through this, DC. More to come.
President Trump made a grave error on several levels by taking over MPD and deploying the DC National Guard without DC's agreement.
He violated the principle of consent of the governed, on which America was founded, and he unintentionally made the strongest possible case for #DCStatehood.
Pres. Trump based his DC Police takeover and deployment of the DC National Guard on a fiction he's consistently pushed since the campaign trail.
DC has not been "overtaken by violent gangs" as he said yesterday.
The opposite is true: Crime is the lowest it's been in 30 years.
As you listen to an unhinged Trump try to justify deploying the National Guard in DC, here's reality:
Violent crime in DC is at a 30-year low.
www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/v...
After the president seized control of DC Police, an unprecedented action, and deployed the DC National Guard without DC's consent, Sen. @ChrisVanHollen & I announced we'll introduce our bills to permanently prevent either from happening again.
Statement: bit.ly/45t70MJ
The president’s unprecedented decision to federalize MPD and activate the DC National Guard is a counterproductive use of DC's resources to use for his own purposes.
It's not justified by the facts, which show that DC crime is at a generational low.
Statement: bit.ly/45JmnBL
Reposted byCongresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC)
1) Violent crime is horrific and unacceptable no matter where it occurs.
2) DC's violent crime rate is at a 30-year low.
3) Presidents have no authority to unilaterally take control of DC. Congress would have to pass a law, and I won't let the current effort get that far.
Albert Pike, a disgraced Confederate general, has no claim to be memorialized in the nation's capital.
I introduced my bill to permanently remove his statue. It belongs in a museum, not in a place of honor in a majority Black and brown city.
More: bit.ly/4ln4Yua
Deploying the feds and discussing abolishing DC's local government in response to an assault where the police responded quickly enough to arrest two perpetrators *as they left the scene* are disproportionate, potentially dangerous, and offensive overreactions.
#HandsOffDC
Even if DC crime weren’t at a historic low point, President Trump's recent comments would be misguided and offensive to 700K+ DC residents.
Federal interference is the problem. The solution is #DCStatehood.
More: bit.ly/41xH3u1
Rep. Ogles is under the misimpression that DC residents need Republicans to "save" them, but all DC needs from Republicans is to stop their attacks and fix the massive budget issue they caused in the CR.
DC can govern itself. The interference is the problem, not the solution.
Sen. Lee is ignoring the facts: The so-called "soft-on-crime" Democrats running DC have achieved the lowest violent crime rate the District has seen in 30 years.
Utah voters should be alarmed by the share of his attention fixated on DC instead of the state he represents.
#HandsOffDC
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History61 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
61 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 2Next →