The repeal of the endangerment finding is a lose-lose for working families and a coup for Trump’s wealthy corporate polluter buddies.
I will not rest until this outrageous repeal is reversed.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Jersey District 6
Frank Pallone, Jr.
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes42%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 6
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Frank Pallone, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Jersey District 6
SoupScore
Frank's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 21 sponsored · 56 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump's agenda is clear: he wants to "nationalize" elections and suppress voters. I'm a HELL NO, and anyone with any sense should be too.
Millions of married people would face an uphill battle to vote if Trump and @houserepublicans.bsky.social’s SAVE Act gets pushed through Congress this week, because it requires the name on your birth certificate to match your current ID to register.
Trump and his lackeys are wildly, hopelessly out of touch.
Our children should be able to learn and grow in spaces that value mutual respect and human dignity, but the Trump Administration is twisting civil rights law to keep disrespectful and degrading Native American mascots in schools. thehill.com/homenews/edu...
Read more about my letter to the FCC chairman here 👇 democrats-energycommerce.house.gov/media/press-...
Media ownership protections promote competition and local news.
Today I reminded FCC Chair Brendan Carr that he has no legal authority to remove the national media ownership cap and demanded he follow the law.
This is what America needs right now. #SuperBowlLX
This is a key road providing access to an important residential community, and it's essential these repairs are made before the retaining wall deteriorates further.
Read more: pallone.house.gov/media/press-releases/pallone-secures-850000-funding-repair-upper-prospect-road-retaining-wall
Great news! I secured $850,000 in federal funding to repair and replace the retaining wall along Upper Prospect Road in Atlantic Highlands.
Read more about how our congressional district is impacted from @HouseBudgetDems: democrats-budget.house.gov/legislation/...
Trump and Congressional Republicans have created a cost of living crisis, making everything from rent to groceries on Super Bowl Sunday more unaffordable than ever.
Today, I kicked off the 11th year of my Youth Advisory Council in Old Bridge with 134 students from across NJ-06. I’m always inspired by the next generation of leaders. Thank you to the Old Bridge Public Library for welcoming us.
If Trump wants to slap his name on something, I've got a couple landfills.
But America's most important infrastructure project needs to move forward.
I’m going to continue to hold Trump’s feet to the fire and ensure this tunnel gets built. www.politico.com/news/2026/02... r.it
This is a positive development that keeps America’s most important infrastructure project moving forward for now. New Jerseyans stood up and spoke out because we know our communities depend on Gateway being seen to completion.
Maya Angelou said, “when someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” Trump has engaged in atrociously racist rhetoric since Day One, and it's only getting worse. House GOP leadership must join @housedemocrats.bsky.social in condemning it.
These are Trump’s immigration stooges. Americans have died on their watch, and they need to go.
Read my entire statement on Trump’s announcement this evening here👇 democrats-energycommerce.house.gov/media/press-...
TrumpRx has been shrouded in secrecy from the beginning because the Administration doesn’t want anyone to know it likely won’t save patients money.
However, we do know Trump only slaps his name on things when there’s something in it for him.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.