Gary C. Peters headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Michigan
Born
December 1, 1958
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-6221
Office
724 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Michigan

Gary C. Peters

Gary Charles Peters is an American politician, lawyer, and former naval officer serving as the senior United States senator from Michigan, a seat he has held since 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the U.S. representative for Michigan's 14th congressional district, which included the eastern half of Detroit, the Grosse Pointes, Hamtramck, Southfield, and Pontiac, from 2009 to 2015.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes33%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gary C. Peters headshot
Gary C. Peters
U.S. SenatorDemocratMichigan
SoupScore
Gary C.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 126 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

For Michiganders, the Great Lakes are part of our DNA. That’s why I'm honored to be named Co-Chair of the bipartisan Senate Great Lakes Task Force. I've spent my whole career protecting our Great Lakes, and I'll keep working to keep them healthy and vibrant for generations to come.
NEWS: I'm honored to have been named the most effective Senator for the third time in a row by the nonpartisan Center for Effective Lawmaking. I’ll keep working to find commonsense, bipartisan solutions and deliver results for Michiganders and Americans across our country.
Proud to stand alongside postal workers from Michigan and across the country to protect the Postal Service that EVERY American relies on. We speak with one voice when we say NO to privatization!
Women deserve equal pay for equal work. Period. Today, on Equal Pay Day, I joined a group of my colleagues in introducing the Paycheck Fairness Act to end pay discrimination and help close the gender pay gap.
Eliminating FEMA would leave millions of Americans vulnerable and unprepared when disasters strike. FEMA’s mitigation, response, and recovery efforts save lives and this decision will recklessly put communities at risk while undermining our homeland security. www.semafor.com/article/03/2...
For nearly 108 years, Selfridge Air National Guard Base has played a key role in keeping Michigan strong and bolstering our national security. I'm proud to partner with Senator Elissa Slotkin to honor the legacy of Selfridge, and the thousands of men and women who have served there.
President Trump is ensuring even more chaos with his April 2nd tariffs on Canada.   He’s hanging the Big Three automakers and American union workers out to dry. We won't gain anything by blowing up our relationship with Michigan's biggest trading partner.
Over 2.5 MILLION Michiganders — including children and seniors — rely on Medicaid to receive quality, affordable health care. President Trump wants to slash Medicaid to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. I'll keep fighting back.
My bipartisan Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act would help the United States attract the major semiconductor investments we need to support Michigan's automakers and outpace the competition. I’m proud it advanced to the full Senate last week.
Cutting the Social Security phone service would make it a whole lot harder for millions of Americans, especially seniors, to access the benefits they've paid into their entire lives. The Trump Administration needs to stop this assault on essential services that Americans rely on.
Make no mistake, this is a step towards President Trump’s goal of eliminating the Department of Education altogether & privatizing our schools. These cuts will hurt students across our country — particularly those who are low-income, rural, or have a disability. It’s a travesty.
The Trump Administration's plan to fire 80,000 VA employees would make it harder for veterans to receive the benefits they earned and deserve. My colleagues and I are calling on the administration to uphold their sacred obligation to care for our veterans.
Abortion providers deliver essential, lifesaving health care to patients in need all across this country. Sadly, violence against providers is all too common. I’m proud to join with Senator Mazie Hirono to designate today as Abortion Provider Appreciation Day.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-03-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (73-25)
2025-03-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-31)
2025-03-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (62-30)
2025-03-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (63-32)
2025-03-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (64-33)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (54-46)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (27-73)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 18Next →