Some big SCOTUS rulings the past two days.
The good news:
✅ Birthright citizenship remains intact.
✅ Mail-in ballots CAN be counted after Election Day (a big blow to Trump’s voter-suppression efforts).
✅ Geofencing warrants are subject to 4th Amendment protections.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 612
Yes42%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
No one, especially students, should be used as a political punching bag, and no state should have its federal funding held hostage for treating children with dignity and respect.
Maine will not be intimidated into abandoning its values or its students.
Today’s SCOTUS ruling gives the Admin new license to bully schools + states that refuse to target transgender kids.
Maine has seen these threats firsthand: sham investigations, school nutrition funds frozen, grants threatened, and even Social Security services for families caught in the crossfire.
That four of the justices chose to overlook or flat-out ignore the Constitution’s plain language is deeply troubling, and further proof that this extreme court is in desperate need of reform.
The 14th Amendment of the Constitution could not be clearer. To repeal this statute would require amending the Constitution itself.
I’m relieved that the Supreme Court ruled to uphold 160 years of precedent and to protect the rights of those who are born on U.S. soil.
Big thanks to @nayyeroar.bsky.social for having me on to talk about fast fashion, the awful SCOTUS decision that gives sweeping immunity to pesticide-makers like Bayer, and other news of the day.
The right to seek justice in court is one of our most foundational freedoms. We must ensure that every American has a fair chance to be heard and hold powerful interests accountable.
Read about our bill 👇
www.thenewlede.org/2026/06/cong...
Federal pesticide law was never supposed to be a liability waiver for corporations or a permission slip to hide behind insufficient labels while people get sick.
Enough with the empty slogans + broken promises. If this Administration won’t put people’s health over corporate profits, Congress must.
🚨NEWS🚨
In wake of SCOTUS's terrible ruling last week in favor of Bayer/Monsanto, Rep. Massie and I just introduced the People Over Poison Act to protect Americans’ right to hold pesticide manufacturers accountable under state law when they fail to warn consumers about the risks of their products.
Here’s hoping whoever opens it in 2276 still knows the sound: kuplink, kuplank, kuplunk. 🫐🇺🇸
I can’t foresee the challenges the next 250 years. We may wander off the trail at times.
But my hope is that we can always find our way back home—with a deeper appreciation for the beauty of the world, a better understanding of all who inhabit it, and, of course, buckets full of blueberries.
In the end, my team and I felt strongly about including a copy of “Blueberries for Sal,” Robert McCloskey’s timeless children’s book about a little girl who goes blueberry picking with her mother—only to cross paths with a bear cub and its mother.
In honor of America’s 250th birthday, each Congressional Delegation was invited to place a few items in a time capsule, to be sealed inside the Capitol until 2276.
Talk about a tough decision!
This decision is a judicial travesty with real human consequences. Congress has the power to correct it, and we have a moral obligation to act. (8/8)
That means:
✅ Requiring country-condition reviews based on facts, humanitarian need, and expert consultation
✅ Preserving work authorization while redesignation or litigation is pending
✅ Creating a long-overdue pathway to permanent status for TPS holders who've contributed to this country. (7/8)
But Congress cannot stop there. We must strengthen TPS protections so that no President can exploit ambiguity in the law to carry out a mass stripping of status rooted in politics, racism, or conspiracy theories. (6/8)
The House has already passed bipartisan legislation to extend TPS protections for Haitians.
Now the Senate must immediately pass the companion bill, send it to the President’s desk, and make clear that Haitians cannot be forced back into danger. (5/8)
This Administration is claiming countries like Haiti are safe enough to send TPS holders back to, but at the same, the State Department continues to warn U.S. citizens not to travel there because of crime, terrorism, kidnapping, and unrest.
So which is it? (4/8)
Congress created TPS in 1990 to protect human lives by providing refuge to those fleeing dangerous circumstances.
The law was never meant to be a trapdoor to be used by a hostile administration to uproot families who've lived here for years, while crises in their home countries continue. (3/8)
Maine is home to hundreds of TPS holders who've fled horrific conditions, followed the rules, paid taxes, sent their kids to school, and built lives in our communities.
Because of Trump's anti-immigrant agenda, and a SCOTUS all too willing to rubber stamp it, their futures are in jeopardy. (2/8)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History612 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
612 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | PRESENT | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.