Let me be absolutely clear: DHS’s operation "Catch of the Day" does not serve the public interest in any way.
It exists solely to meet anti-immigration quotas.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 158 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
There are so many questions.
I’m continuing to push for answers about this operation.
Mainers and new Mainers alike: Please stay safe, stay vigilant, and know your rights.
Of the 50 picked up yesterday how many were dangerous criminals who had warrants signed by a judge? How many were explained their rights + given due process? How many are here legally and have the paperwork to prove it? How many were targeted solely on the color of their skin? Where were they taken?
DHS says they have a “list” of around 1,400 people to round up in what they’re calling “Operation Catch of the Day” — a completely disgusting and inhumane name for their terror campaign in our state.
Last week it was Rollins and her “piece of chicken, piece of broccoli, corn tortilla, and one other thing.”
Today Bessent says having “5, 10, 12 homes” is a totally normal retirement strategy.
If these people were any more out of touch, they’d be orbiting the moon.
Here’s an idea: TAX THE RICH.
This week the House is expected to vote on the Homeland Security funding bill.
It does NOT include reforms proposed by Democrats like:
❌Preventing citizens from being detained
❌Banning enforcement actions at sensitive locations (like schools)
❌Making ICE remove their masks
I plan to vote NO.
And so are the American people—by standing up, pushing back, making your voices heard, and protecting your neighbors.
For our families, for our communities, for our democracy, and for a future free of chaos, cruelty, and stupidity—let’s stand together. (3/3)
Trump is dangerously unhinged. He’s also incredibly weak—and deeply unpopular. Republicans refuse to do anything to check the president, but Democrats are fighting every day to hold him and his regime accountable. (2/3)
🧵
One year ago today, Trump was sworn into his second term. It’s impossible to list all the damage he and his Administration have done since. They’ve made a mockery of our constitution, terrorized our communities, and embarrassed our country on the global stage time and again. (1/3)
Today, as we celebrate Dr. King’s life and legacy, let us heed these wise and powerful words: by speaking out, by standing up for what's right, by fighting back against injustice, and by looking out for our neighbors. (2/2)
In these tumultuous times, there are few people whose words and actions feel more relevant—or more important—than those of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
This quote in particular really struck a chord with me:
“The time is always right to do what is right.” (1/2)
Trump’s insane post about Greenland was incredibly reckless.
He’s jeopardizing NATO, undoing our centuries-old alliance with Denmark, and risking economic catastrophe—all because of his delusional idea that we need Greenland for “national security.”
He needs to quit acting like an asshole.
ICE could launch operations in Maine in the coming days.
Some helpful resources:
✊ Maine Immigrants’ Rights Coalition (maineimmigrantrights.org)
✊ Maine ACLU (aclumaine.org)
Report ICE info to the MIRC hotline (207.544.9989)
Stay peaceful, help your neighbors, and KNOW YOUR RIGHTS (link below)!
As Maine faces potential increased ICE operations, this ruling sets a crucial precedent.
We're grateful to MN activists and the ACLU for this fight. Their courage helps protect *all* our rights.
We'll continue monitoring enforcement in Maine—and ensuring operations respect our residents' rights.
Important win in Minnesota!
A federal judge has restricted immigration agents from retaliating against peaceful protesters (including using pepper spray).
The court made it clear: Peaceful protest is protected, and federal agents cannot intimidate or use force against people exercising that right.
Americans deserve a legal system that protects their right to safety, not one that grants immunity to powerful corporations.
Corporate influence should never outweigh human lives, and I will continue to do everything in our power to hold these companies accountable for the harms they cause.
It looks like SCOTUS may be prepared to side with chemical companies.
It’s clear that Bayer—with the full-throated support of the Trump Administration—will do anything to protect their profits + avoid accountability.
A helpful reminder to my fellow Mainers (and all Americans) 👇
I was born in Minnesota. I still have family there. I’m angered and heartbroken by everything that’s happening—and deeply worried about the chaos and violence ICE might bring to Maine.
I asked the experts on the ground in Minneapolis what Mainers need to do to be prepared.
Hear their responses 👇
U.S. citizens harassed, beaten, and abducted.
One observer—who dared to ask if a group of officers were ICE—was forced to the ground, handcuffed, taken to a federal building, and had her wedding ring cut off.
This isn’t law-enforcement. It’s a campaign of terror against an entire community. (2/2)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.