At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from California

Born

June 22, 1960

Age 65

Phone

(202) 224-3841

Office

112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California

Adam B. Schiff

Adam Bennett Schiff is an American lawyer and politician serving as the junior United States senator from California, a seat he has held since 2024. A member of the Democratic Party, Schiff served 12 terms in the United States House of Representatives from 2001 to 2024 and was a member of the California State Senate from 1996 to 2000.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 772

Yes29%

No69%

Present0%

Not Voting2%

Party align93%

Cross-party5%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @SenAdamSchiff Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Adam B. Schiff

U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia

SoupScore

Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 52 sponsored · 295 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 4(source)

Los Angeles has seen giant corporate landlords buying up droves of lots in the wake of devastating fires — lowballing offers and taking advantage of vulnerable families. My new bill cracks down on this practice on behalf of every Californian and American recovering from a natural disaster.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 4(source)

Kristi Noem is taking no responsibility for how DHS is operating under her “leadership.” The American people deserve accountability for ICE and CBP's violence in our streets. This has to stop.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 4(source)

Taxpayers are funding a $220 million propaganda campaign promoting... Kristi Noem. I asked Secretary Noem how these lucrative government contracts ended up with the PR firm which formerly ran her campaign ads, and which is run by the husband of her staff. Here's what she had to say:

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 4(source)

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem testified that detainees receive medical attention within 12 hours. That’s just plain false. Listen to the U.S. Citizens who were wrongfully detained and denied critical care.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 4(source)

The Trump administration knew from the start of this war of that Iran would retaliate. But they didn't anticipate needing to evacuate Americans in the region? The lack of planning for this war of choice is putting even more American lives at risk.

Multiple US embassies are telling Americans they cannot evacuate or help them get out of the Middle East

US embassies in Jerusalem and Qatar issued statements on Tuesday saying they could not help Americans leave the Middle East.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 3(source)

Within hours of the killing of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, Kristi Noem said they were engaged in domestic terrorism. That was an unfounded and pathetic slur. Today, she again made it clear she sees nothing wrong with misleading the public.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 3(source)

Let’s hear from President Trump about what kind of president would start a war with Iran.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 3(source)

Americans don’t want another forever war. They want affordable health care. They want to feel safe in their communities. They want lower prices. Like you promised.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 3(source)

@raskin.house.gov, @blumenthal.senate.gov, and I are continuing to demand answers — including the role Trump fixer Boris Epshteyn played in brokering these corrupt bargains.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 3(source)

Top law firms are still providing free legal services at Trump's bidding, even though doing so may be a clear violation of the law. Just one day after the administration said it would abandon its defense of its attacks on law firms, they unsurprisingly reversed course. 🧵

Kirkland Pressed by Democrats on Epshteyn’s Role in Trump Deal

Kirkland & Ellis is facing new questions about its deal with President Donald Trump, including the part that Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn played in landing the agreement.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 2(source)

The same administration that removed historical testaments to Jackie Robinson and the Navajo Code Talkers has no problem with this new banner. We have entered a dangerous new period of censorship and propaganda.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 2(source)

We must address this insidious threat. Last week, I led calls to the CFTC urging the agency to uphold the law and halt these contracts. If the CFTC won’t act, Congress must. www.cnbc.com/2026/02/24/s...

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 2(source)

Gambling on war and death doesn’t just present national security risks, it also raises serious concerns about potential insider trading — presenting unscrupulous government officials with a chance to profit off the new war in Iran. These contracts are immoral. The CFTC can and must ban them.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 2(source)

Community colleges are sacred spaces where students come to learn and begin to build their futures. It was such a privilege to visit Allan Hancock Community College to speak with students and answer their questions.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 2(source)

Congress holds the power to declare war - not the President. I will be joining Senators Kaine, Paul and Schumer in forcing a vote on our war powers resolution to make it clear: Congress has not authorized this use of our military.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 1(source)

Donald Trump has not made the case to the American people for his new war. There was no imminent threat to the country that justified putting our troops at risk. I'll be helping force a debate and vote in the Senate that would end it.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govMar 1(source)

My thoughts are with the families of these servicemembers, and their loved ones. And I continue to pray for the safety of every servicemember and the recovery of those wounded in these operations. May God protect our troops.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govFeb 28(source)

Americans do not want another forever war in the Middle East. Congress must return to DC immediately to reassert its war powers.

Sen. Adam Schiff@schiff.senate.govFeb 28(source)

Congress should immediately return to vote on the Kaine Paul Schiff Schumer War Powers Resolution.

← Newer postsPosts page 10Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(52)

S. Res. 718 (119th)
A resolution commending and congratulating the University of California, Los Angeles Bruins …
S. 4453 (119th)
A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to ensure t…
S. 4414 (119th)
A bill to improve educational efforts related to artificial intelligence literacy at the ele…
S. 4402 (119th)
A bill to require a report on the use of artificial intelligence with respect to access to u…
S. 4361 (119th)
A bill to modify the reasonable requirements that may be imposed on pet owners living in pub…

Cosponsored Bills(295)

S. 4470 (119th)
A bill to amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to improve the Offi…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. Res. 715 (119th)
A resolution recognizing escalating threats to freedom of the press and freedom of speech wo…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. Res. 721 (119th)
A resolution honoring the life and legacy of Robert S. Mueller, III and commending him for a…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S.J. Res. 191 (119th)
A joint resolution to direct removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within o…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4437 (119th)
A bill to amend the Animal Welfare Act to establish additional requirements for dealers, and…
Joined: 2026-04-29

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

772 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-10-15	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-14	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Final passage	NO	YES	✕	Bill Passed (77-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (10-88, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (14-83, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-10-09	H.J. Res. 106 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 106	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-09	H.J. Res. 106 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-09	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08	H.J. Res. 105 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 105	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (50-45)
2025-10-08	S.J. Res. 83 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 83	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (48-51)
2025-10-08	S.J. Res. 71 (119th)	Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 71	YES	YES	✓	Joint Resolution Defeated (47-51)
2025-10-08	H.J. Res. 105 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-08	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-08	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08	H.J. Res. 104 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 104	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-10-07	H.J. Res. 104 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-07	S. Res. 412 (119th)	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-06	S. Res. 412 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-10-06	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-42, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-06	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03	S. Res. 412 (119th)	Resolution S.Res. 412	NO	NO	✓	Resolution Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-01	S. Res. 412 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-01	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-10-01	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-01	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-01	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Bill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30	S. 2882 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Bill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29	S. 2806 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Bill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19	S. 2882 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Bill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-18	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17	—	Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25	YES	YES	✓	Decision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17	—	Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 16Next →