Adrian Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Nebraska District 3
Born
December 19, 1970
Age 55
Phone
(202) 225-6435
Office
502 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nebraska District 3

Adrian Smith

Adrian Michael Smith is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 48th district in the Nebraska Legislature from 1999 to 2007. Smith is the dean of Nebraska's congressional delegation since 2022 following Jeff Fortenberry's resignation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 581
Yes75%
No22%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Adrian Smith headshot
Adrian Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNebraska District 3
SoupScore
Adrian's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 86 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Elon, I hate to break it to you but you aren’t my boss. I answer to the people of Minnesota. But since you bring it up, I spent last week fighting to stop tax breaks for billionaires like you, paid for by defunding health care for moms and babies
Senator Tina Smith said: This is the ultimate dick boss move from Musk - except he isn’t even the boss, he’s just a dick.

That was in response to Musk saying “Consistent with President @realDonaldTrump's instructions, all federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week. Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”

Musk responded @SenTinaSmith “What did you get done last week?”
I bet a lot of people have had an experience like this with a bad boss - there’s an email in your inbox on Saturday night saying, “Prove to me your worthiness by Monday or else.” I’m on the side of the workers, not the billionaire asshole bosses.
- Not to take on prescription price gouging - Not to protect veterans’ health care - Not to protect our avian flu response - Not to protect funding for firefighters - Not to protect funding for police officers All to pay for tax breaks for corporations.
On a Saturday too? Wow — well, here’s a summary of what Republicans voted to do this week: - Defund Medicaid - Defund Medicare - Not to protect IVF funding - Not to protect food assistance
@elonmusk: Consistent with President @realDonaldTrump's instructions, all federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week.
Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.
Just so everybody is clear on Republican priorities: We put up an amendment to make sure nobody making over $500 million gets a tax cut. Republicans voted against it.
Senate Republicans once again showed us their true colors last night. They want to pay for tax breaks for their rich corporate friends by defunding your Medicaid and Medicare. Unreal.
Reposted byTina Smith
It's nearly 5am and Republicans just rammed through their pro-billionaire, anti-middle class budget blueprint. In order to pass massive tax giveaways for billionaires, they're going to defund Medicaid, slash veterans benefits, & force kids to go hungry. Make sure everyone knows it.
I’ve spent years fighting for better postal service for all Minnesotans, especially in the most rural places. This will hurt every single one of us.
Any Republicans want to grow a spine and stand up to this with us? Many of you represent rural areas who will suffer the most from this!
🚨 Big News 🚨 

Trump plans to fire the USPS governing board, merge the Postal Service into the Commerce Dept. 

It would disrupt 55 years of non-political mail service, and threatens to upend trillions of dollars of ecommerce and the 250 year-old US mail system.
Reposted byTina Smith
Giving tax cuts to the wealthiest while gutting programs families rely on—that’s the Republican plan. Democrats just tried to pass an amendment that would prevent a tax cut for those earning more than one billion dollars. Senate Republicans blocked it.
Bottom line: Abortion bans are cruel. And women in this country are being harmed by them every day.   Denying women life-saving care shouldn't happen - and yes, abortions can be life-saving care.
NEW: Texas Banned Abortion. Then Sepsis Rates Soared. ProPublica’s first-of-its-kind analysis is the most detailed look yet into a rise in life-threatening complications for women experiencing pregnancy loss under Texas’ abortion ban.
Republicans are trying to pass a measure in the dark of night to screw over working people so they can send a bunch of tax cuts to billionaires and big corporations. We won’t let them do it without a fight.
Trump and Musk have fired Minnesotans like: -- Park Rangers at Voyageurs -- Fire protection engineers -- Workers who care for our veterans -- Workers who care for folks with disabilities -- Workers who dole out small business loans How does this help anyone?
A Minnesotan who worked for the federal government was fired, rehired and then fired again within a span of two weeks.
Just because DOGE doesn’t agree with a policy doesn’t make it fraud or waste. What they’re really talking about is cutting your benefits.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
581 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-09H.R. 6644 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESFailed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 12Next →