My heart goes out to all those impacted by the horrific floods in Texas this weekend, and to the loved ones of those who lost their lives.
I extend my sincere gratitude to the first responders working around the clock to save lives amid ongoing rescue and recovery efforts.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes41%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 283 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I was honored to be a part of a naturalization ceremony at the Strawbery Banke Museum in Portsmouth today.
Congratulations to each and every new citizen on this momentous occasion!
I'm extremely alarmed that President Trump's proposed budget would eliminate federal funding for New Hampshire's cancer registry.
In order to "Make America Healthy Again," we need to know where and when patterns of illness arise so we can tackle them head on.
The Republican megabill will take health care coverage away from tens of thousands of Granite Staters just to give billionaires a few extra bucks.
I visited Monadnock Family Services to speak with local caregivers and families about what the impact of these cuts would be in NH.
As Ukraine is pummeled by Russian drones, this is the worst time to be cutting back on the weapons they need to defend themselves—which were already on the way when they were halted. Secretary Hegseth and Under Secretary Colby clearly don't understand the impact of this war on US national security.
After a positive meeting between President Trump and President Zelensky at the NATO Summit, it's distressing to see that Secretary Hegseth and Under Secretary Colby decided to halt weapons shipments to Ukraine.
This sends the wrong message not only to our allies but to our adversaries.
🌲It's officially National Parks and Recreation Month!
New Hampshire is home to some of the best outdoor spaces and places in the nation! Find a park near you⬇️
www.nhstateparks.org/find-parks-t...
46,000
That's how many Granite Staters lose health care coverage under the bill Senate Republicans voted for.
They're making the largest cut to health care in American history to give more money to billionaires.
I'm deeply disappointed that my Republican colleagues passed a bill that will rip health care and food assistance away from millions of Americans while also increasing energy costs for millions more so that Trump can cut taxes for the ultra wealthy.
At a moment when Americans are feeling squeezed by high prices, we should be making every effort to lower costs.
The Republican "Big Beautiful Bill" will line the pockets of the ultra rich by increasing energy bills and taking health care and food assistance away from families.
Overnight, nearly all Republicans blocked my amendment to preserve tax credits that lower energy costs for families, make housing more affordable and help give businesses needed certainty.
Energy and home prices are already too high. Trump's bill will make them even higher.
While Republicans jam through a disastrous budget bill that punishes working families to give handouts to the ultra-wealthy, I'm offering an amendment to save tax breaks that make energy and housing more affordable for Granite Staters. I'm calling on my colleagues to vote YES.
The so-called Republican “Big Beautiful Bill” would be the largest transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in a single bill in history.
It takes away health care and food from working families and raises household energy costs, all to give more money to billionaires.
I've met with health care leaders in NH's rural communities who are worried about their ability to deliver lifesaving services—and that was before Trump's proposed cuts.
This megabill would devastate rural hospitals and make accessing care even harder for rural Granite Staters.
I’ve heard from countless Granite Staters who are deeply anxious about what the Republican megabill would mean for them and their families.
They are real people, and this bill is not just words on a page – it is a direct attack on their health and economic security.
From milk to cheese to ice cream, New Hampshire's dairy farmers play a vital role in our food system and state economy. As National Dairy Month comes to a close, I'll keep working to find ways to support the small dairy producers that make the Granite State unique.
President Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” is a big betrayal of the American people.
There's nothing beautiful about taking away health care and food from working families to give more money to billionaires.
No matter how you slice it, selling off our public lands to give tax breaks to the wealthy is a terrible idea. Add to that massive cuts to staffing at our National Parks and it’s easy to see why the Republican megabill is so unpopular with all of us who love the outdoors.
The important message from this week's NATO Summit in the Hague was not just the historic 5% defense spending target, it was the unified message we sent to our adversaries that our Alliance is strong and united.
Our collective support for Ukraine is and will remain unbreakable.
Granite State communities are facing sky-high electricity prices and investing in energy efficiency can help bring these costs down. Energy Circuit Riders help small towns and rural communities make improvements to become more energy efficient and lower their energy bills.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2026-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2026-05-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44) |
| 2026-05-11 | S. Res. 690 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (46-45) |
| 2026-04-30 | S.J. Res. 184 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-04-30 | S. Res. 690 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-04-29 | S.J. Res. 99 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-04-29 | S.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2026-04-28 | S.J. Res. 124 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 124 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Well Taken (51-47) |
| 2026-04-28 | S. Res. 690 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2026-04-27 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-49) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-04-23 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (25-73) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-23 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (98-0) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-04-22 | S.J. Res. 114 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51) |
| 2026-04-21 | S. Con. Res. 33 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2026-04-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (47-46) |
| 2026-04-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-04-16 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-49) |
| 2026-04-15 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2026-04-15 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 138 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 32 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59) |
| 2026-04-15 | S.J. Res. 123 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2026-04-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2026-04-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-26 | S. 1383 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-25 | S.J. Res. 103 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-03-25 | S.J. Res. 107 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-24 | S.J. Res. 116 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2026-03-24 | S. 1383 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 16Next →