PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Cynthia Jeanne Shaheen is an American politician and former educator serving since 2009 as the senior United States senator from New Hampshire. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 1997 to 2003 as the 78th governor of New Hampshire. Shaheen is the first woman elected both governor and a U.S. senator, and was the first female governor of New Hampshire.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 782
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenatorShaheenFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 283 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 10(source)
Trump’s tariff taxes are disastrous for businesses and Americans around the country. New Hampshire is going to be particularly hard-hit. The last thing we need is higher gas prices and more expensive heating oil when families are already stretching their paycheck to cover costs.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 10(source)
In honor of #HarrietTubmanDay, I’m renewing my push to put Harriet Tubman, an American icon, on the $20 bill. Women and girls, especially communities of color, deserve to see themselves represented and celebrated – and I won’t stop fighting until we see it through.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 8(source)
I'm glad that many of the planned tariffs on Canada and Mexico have been postponed, but businesses in our state still face uncertainty. I visited American Calan Inc. to learn more about their work and how these tariffs are already impacting them.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 8(source)
Government funding runs out in 1 week and what are Republicans in Congress focused on? Turning your tax dollars into Musk and Trump's slush fund. Republicans must return to the negotiating table to avoid a shutdown and fully fund the government in a responsible, bipartisan way.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 6(source)
Access to quality, affordable child care is among the top concerns I hear about from Granite Staters, and we need to address this challenge head on. That's why I'm working across the aisle to introduce comprehensive legislation that will increase supply and lower costs for families.
Shaheen Introduces Bipartisan, Bicameral Proposal to Make Child Care More Affordable | U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire
(Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) introduced the Child Care Availability and...
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 6(source)
I'm introducing bipartisan legislation to help working families in rural areas maintain access to safe and affordable housing. We have an opportunity to come together to get this done – and I’m encouraging both parties to do just that by advancing our commonsense bill.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 6(source)
The U.S. Department of Defense's decision to rescind a policy that allowed service members to more easily access reproductive care sends a message to service women that they are not as valuable as their male counterparts. msmagazine.com/2025/02/21/p...
Pentagon Reverses Policy of Reimbursement for Abortion Travel—Fighting 'Wokeness' in the Military at the Expense of Service Members
The Pentagon’s decision to rescind abortion travel reimbursements—following Trump’s executive order enforcing the Hyde Amendment—has sparked fierce opposition from lawmakers and veterans' advocates, w...
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 6(source)
Some Congressional Republicans want you to believe that cutting Medicaid will save money. In reality, they plan to use those savings to pay for a billionaire tax break. Medicaid cuts would be disastrous for New Hampshire where nearly half of all beneficiaries are children.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
Nobody likes long waits at the doctor's office. But we know if Republicans refuse to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits, we will lose more than a quarter million jobs, hurting our hospitals, doctors and pharmacies.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
Trump’s speech last night sounded more like reality TV than reality. Fact: there aren’t millions of people over 100 years of age fraudulently claiming social security benefits.
Axios
@axios.com
Open post ↗
President Trump called for an end to people hundreds of years old collecting Social Security benefits — a claim his own administration has debunked.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
The Air Traffic Control system needs comprehensive reform and investment, not a temporary fix. My bipartisan legislation would expand the workforce pipeline, enhance training facilities and equipment, improve recruitment and retention efforts and more.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
I’m disappointed but not surprised that Trump didn’t utter a single word about improving access to child care tonight. If Trump really wanted to lower the cost of everything then ensuring access to quality, affordable child care would be a top priority.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
Trump, the best thing you can do for U.S. shipbuilding is leave Portsmouth Naval Shipyard alone and stop messing with the workforce that keeps our country safe and strong. www.bostonglobe.com/2025/03/03/m...
Hundreds of jobs on the line at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard amid federal firings - The Boston Globe
There are about 645 probationary employees at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard who are anxiously awaiting news of whether their positions are among those being eliminated in a purge of the federal workfo...
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
Tariffs won't lower costs for Americans. Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico alone will increase food costs by $110 for families. So next time you’re at the grocery store and shocked by your high bill, thank Trump.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
Speaking of the budget: let's not forget that House Republicans want to gut Medicaid. If Trump gets his way here, billionaires will win big and folks who are just trying to access affordable health care will lose.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
POTUS's real tax plan? To give his billionaire friends like Elon Musk a tax break on the backs of working people. During his campaign, Trump promised voters he wouldn't touch programs like Medicaid or Social Security but the proposed Republican budget tells a different story.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
As elected officials we need to be responsible with your tax dollars and cut waste where we can. But instead of working across the aisle, DOGE is using a wrecking ball to indiscriminately target vital programs and services that Granite Staters rely on.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 5(source)
We know energy efficiency is the cheapest, fastest way to deal with our energy needs. Trump’s decision to cut off funding for clean energy projects and halt energy efficiency programs won't lower costs for Americans—it'll raise energy prices.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govMar 4(source)
Republicans blocked my bill to lower costs for Americans. My bill would have helped ensure that households across the country are not forced to pay higher prices on everyday goods because of Trump's reckless tariffs on Canada and Mexico.
← Newer postsPosts page 41Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
782 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 130 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 141 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-50)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 132 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-52)
2026-05-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-05-13S. Res. 526 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (99-0, 3/5 majority required)
2026-05-13S.J. Res. 163 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 163YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-05-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-05-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-05-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-05-11S. Res. 690 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (46-45)
2026-04-30S.J. Res. 184 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 184YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-30S. Res. 690 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 99 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-04-29S.J. Res. 139 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-29—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (59-39)
2026-04-28S.J. Res. 124 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 124NONO✓Point of Order Well Taken (51-47)
2026-04-28S. Res. 690 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2026-04-27—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-49)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-50)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Padilla Amdt. No. 4855)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5159)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-52)
2026-04-23S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (25-73)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Markey Amdt. No. 5001)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hawley Amdt. No. 4794)NONO✓Motion Rejected (50-48, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-23—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kennedy Amdt. No. 5414)NONO✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Alsobrooks Amdt. No. 5294)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 4956)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hirono Amdt. No. 4884)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (98-0)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Ossoff Amdt. No. 4897)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Lujan Amdt. No. 4798)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 4799)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-04-22S.J. Res. 114 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 114YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (46-51)
2026-04-21S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2026-04-20—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (47-46)
2026-04-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-04-16H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49)
2026-04-15H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-48)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 138 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 138YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (36-63)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 32 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 32YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (40-59)
2026-04-15S.J. Res. 123 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 123YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-52)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-04-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2026-04-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2026-04-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-03-26H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 16Next →