🗓️In early April, we’re also hearing there will be a 25% tariff on all automotive, pharmaceutical and semiconductor products. And the impact?
a) Prices would rise.
b) Prices would rise.
c) Prices would rise.
Hint: Semiconductors are in almost all the electronics we use.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes43%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 93 sponsored · 305 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Per initial estimates, Trump’s reciprocal tariffs would:
⬆️Raise costs by $2,700 to $3,400 for households per year
⬇️Shrink the economy by $100 billion per year
With the worst price hikes on everyday items like clothing, electronics, energy and drug prices.
🗓️And in early April, we can expect Trump to start putting broad reciprocal tariffs on every country we trade with. You heard right—every country.
If this happens, tariffs would be at their highest level since the Great Depression.
How will that effect you?
For starters, 100,000 jobs across the country would be at risk. Not to mention, raising the cost of new housing construction at a time when we’re facing a nationwide housing affordability crisis.
🗓️Then, the next week, Trump plans to level 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum.
Who uses steel and aluminum?
Think the auto and aerospace industries, as well as construction companies.
Tariffs on Canada and Mexico will spike costs for families everywhere, making it harder to balance their budgets:
➕That’s ~$1,000 more in expenses per year for families
➕$150-$250 more for heating to stay warm each winter
➕Higher prices at the pump and in grocery stores
🗓️First, Trump has promised tariffs on our allies, Canada and Mexico—10% on energy from Canada and 25% on everything else.
Today, he said these will go into effect next Tuesday.
Whether they take effect next week or next month, they've already created panic and uncertainty.
🧵Let’s talk Trump’s tariffs and what that could mean for your family and your budget. Trump is proposing 4 different sets of tariffs – taxes on imports PAID by Americans—take a look:
We should be working to lower energy costs for folks across the country, but Trump’s actions to cut off funding for clean energy, halt energy efficiency programs and level tariffs on heating oil, propane and gasoline are going to do the exact opposite.
By blocking federal funding for good projects, President Trump is stiffing working Americans, small businesses and our communities.
The American people elected Donald Trump to lower energy costs—instead he's actively doing the opposite and causing financial hardship.
I'm all for making government more efficient and cutting waste, but if you needed more proof that Trump and Elon Musk don't have a real plan to do that, keep reading ⬇️
NEW: DOGE quietly deletes the five largest spending cuts it had been celebrating last week.
All of them contained errors that wildly over-inflated how much had been saved. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/u...
Despite what Trump might have said, slashing Medicaid is on the table in the U.S. House.
All so that Republicans in Congress, Trump and Elon Musk can come up with trillions to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy in this country.
I’ve heard from far too many Granite Staters forced to ration their life-saving medications because costs are too high. It’s unacceptable.
Our legislation would allow prescription drugs to be imported from pharmacies in Canada increasing competition and lowering costs.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau keeps scammers, fraudsters and predatory companies in check, protecting you and your hard-earned dollars.
By dismantling CFPB, Trump and Elon Musk are protecting their billionaire friends and corporate insiders at your expense.
Last week, I offered an amendment to the Senate Republican budget resolution to prevent health care costs from skyrocketing for millions of Americans by extending the Affordable Care Act tax credits.
Republicans voted it down.
One in seven Granite Staters get their health insurance through Medicaid, including nearly 100,000 children. This morning, I joined providers, advocates and Medicaid recipients to discuss how potential Republican-led cuts would hurt their lives and communities.
Let's be clear, what Trump promised was not that he was going to come in and indiscriminately fire people and cut services.
He said he was going to lower the cost of everything from food to rent to energy costs.
He hasn't done any of that.
Elon Musk is sowing more confusion with his latest email over the weekend to federal employees. Trump's administration has done nothing but create uncertainty and chaos at every level of our government. Why aren't they focusing on lowering costs?
Too many Americans are struggling with the cost of living—and what is President Trump doing?
Proposing tariffs that would raise prices on everyday items
Halting federal funding that families rely on
Firing employees who live and work in our communities
www.cnn.com/2025/02/21/e...
Firing 1,000s of VA employees, many of whom are veterans themselves, is unacceptable.
This will only make it harder for our veterans to access care.
We should put veterans first, which is why I joined my colleagues in calling for the VA to reverse these mass terminations.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 196 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
| 2026-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (48-39) |
| 2026-06-18 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-17 | S. Res. 616 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (55-39) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-16 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (87-8) |
| 2026-06-16 | S.J. Res. 172 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 172 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-48) |
| 2026-06-16 | S.J. Res. 190 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-48) |
| 2026-06-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-43) |
| 2026-06-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-43) |
| 2026-06-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2026-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-06-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Budgetary Discipline Re: Lee Amdt. No. 5804) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (50-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-51) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 1318 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (52-47) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schiff Amdt. No. 5740) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 5632) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (53-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Cassidy Amdt. No. 5812) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Coons Amdt. No. 5457) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | S. 2 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2026-06-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Durbin Amdt. No. 5806) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Booker Amdt. No. 5803) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 5485) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Sanders Amdt. No. 5451) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | S. 2 (119th) | Motion (Warnock Motion to Commit S. 2 to the Committee on the Judiciary with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-52) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Kim Amdt. No. 5545) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 5501) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (51-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Graham Amdt. No. 5779) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-04 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 5556) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-49, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 18Next →