My office is closely monitoring the ongoing military action in the Middle East. American citizens currently in the Middle East should follow Department of State advisories and guidance on the latest security alerts issued by the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Illinois District 10
Bradley Scott Schneider
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes46%
No51%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 10
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Bradley Scott Schneider
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratIllinois District 10
SoupScore
Bradley Scott's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 140 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Our Constitution explicitly gives Congress the exclusive power to declare war. The President of the United States is not allowed to take our nation to war without authorization from Congress. Speaker Johnson should immediately call the House back into session. My statement on Iran:
We cannot let up the pressure on the administration when it comes to releasing the full Epstein files. This latest report raises serious concerns about continued obstruction and a potential cover-up.
www.npr.org/2026/02/24/n...
My office is closely monitoring ongoing events in Mexico.
The cost of Trump’s tariff chaos is real, for American families, small business owners, and retirement accounts. It’s finally coming to an end. My statement...
They gutted Medicaid, slashed food assistance programs, and took away the ACA tax credit to pay for this... $38 billion in ICE warehouses.
Vaccine skeptics should never be in charge of decisions that affect public health, especially those whose harmful ideologies put women and children's lives at risk.
thehill.com/policy/healt...
The SAVE America Act isn’t about election integrity; it’s about creating new barriers to the ballot. That’s why I'm voting NO.
What would you have done with the extra $1,000 you would have had last year if not for Trump's tariff tax?
abcnews.go.com/Business/tru...
Not enough, Mr. Homan. End the siege of Minneapolis and every other community ICE and CBP are terrorizing.
www.nytimes.com/live/2026/02...
Not a penny more for DHS until ICE and CBP stop their reign of terror.
Today, I joined my Democratic colleagues outside ICE headquarters to call for the immediate removal of Kristi Noem. She must go. If the President refuses to act, Congress has a responsibility to begin impeachment proceedings.
In what’s already been a harsh winter, Republican policies are about to leave 340,000 people in Illinois hungry.
www.chicagotribune.com/2026/01/27/s...
The US government has the blood of an American citizen on its hands. Again.
ICE is out of control. I voted against the DHS funding bill that would allow ice to continue its terror unchecked.
The bottom line is that DHS & ICE should be focused on securing our borders & keeping hardened criminals out of our communities. Instead they are terrorizing our communities, while targeting hardworking people without regard for their constitutional rights and basic dignity.
I can't in good faith support a funding bill that fails to:
➡️force real change in ICE actions around the US
➡️establish enforceable guardrails around ICE activities going forward
➡️ensure real accountability for leadership w/in ICE & DHS
➡️reestablish proper Congressional oversight
ICE is out of control.
The House is scheduled to vote tomorrow on funding for the Department of Homeland Security, including ICE.
I will miss the wonderful community Pam and Larry created at Green Bay Cycles. Wishing them only great things in retirement. Ride on my friends.
www.therecordnorthshore.org/2026/01/16/g...
365 days of chaos, fear, and paying more for less
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | PRESENT | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.