At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from Hawaii

Born

October 20, 1972

Age 53

Phone

(202) 224-3934

Office

722 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Hawaii

Brian Schatz

Brian Emanuel Schatz is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from Hawaii, a seat he has held since 2012. A progressive Democrat, Schatz served in the Hawaii House of Representatives from 1998 to 2006, representing the 25th legislative district; as the chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii from 2008 to 2010; and as the 12th lieutenant governor of Hawaii from 2010 to 2012.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 772

Yes26%

No73%

Present0%

Not Voting1%

Party align96%

Cross-party1%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @SenBrianSchatz Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Brian Schatz

U.S. SenatorDemocratHawaii

SoupScore

Brian's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 44 sponsored · 168 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byBrian Schatz

Jeff Stein@jeffstein.bsky.socialNov 26(source)

** TRUMP THREATENS 25% TARIFFS ON ALL MEXICO IMPORTS The US imported $476 billion from Mexico last year - more than any other country A 25 percent tariff on those imports would translate into a roughly $100 billion annual tax — or ~$1 trillion over the next decade

Reposted byBrian Schatz

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 26(source)

Trump tariffs are going to raise the price of lots of stuff regular people buy. Republicans are going to raise the price of your Walmart or Costco trip and use the extra money you pay for tax cuts for multinational corporations.

Reposted byBrian Schatz

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 26(source)

They want to raise your prices to cut their taxes.

Jeff Stein

@jeffstein.bsky.social

Open post ↗

Reposted byBrian Schatz

Cory Booker@corybooker.comNov 26(source)

This is outrageous @schatz.bsky.social - and remember if someone tells you who they are and what they are going to do, believe them. Looking forward to standing with you and so many others to fight against this policy which would punish Americans with higher prices.

Brian Schatz

@schatz.bsky.social

Open post ↗

They want to raise your prices to cut their taxes.

Unknown

@unknown

Open post ↗

Reposted byBrian Schatz

Brian Tyler Cohen@briantylercohen.bsky.socialNov 26(source)

This will mean higher gas prices, higher alcohol prices, higher food prices, higher building prices, higher car prices, higher pharmaceutical prices, etc. Trump is about to teach Americans who *actually* pays for tariffs (the consumers do).

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 26(source)

They want to raise your prices to cut their taxes.

Jeff Stein

@jeffstein.bsky.social

Open post ↗

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

just re-read this tweet and the last thing is just bad. Sorry! It’s not what I meant to say.

Reposted byBrian Schatz

Brian Stelter@brianstelter.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

Scooplet in today's Reliable Sources newsletter: At least one benevolent billionaire with liberal bonafides has already reached out to acquaintances at MSNBC to express interest in buying the cable channel someday* *The channel is not actually for sale right now Full newsletter: cnn.it/4g269WV

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

Yeah I see that and it’s a real issue but we also need to be willing to make smart choices at the expense of looking busy in front of people yelling in our replies. . “People have temporarily stopped yelling at me online” is not the same as “the base is satisfied.”

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

This is absolutely not what I’m suggesting. I am saying that the broad public is not gonna talk about the tax fight which will occur in two to four months three days before Thanksgiving. Not every tactical thing is some high principle or a measure of one’s courage.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

Sheesh I’m simply saying most people aren’t ready to focus on this yet and screaming into the void while people are doing other things is wasted energy. I am always working on the things I’m posting about fyi.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

This is why I’m posting about it. But I’m not gonna start out like I was shot out of a cannon when most people are trying to pull together a meal or travel or clean their place or whatever.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

I’m saying we should talk to people about these things when the fight is upon us but feel free to start now, as I did.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

The tax fight next year is going to be an absolute barn burner and it gives our side a perfect opportunity for moral and strategic clarity. They want to raise the price of stuff you buy and use your money to give more to corporations. Let’s keep it simple and let’s fight, after the holidays.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

I think we should separate the Rufo project from the legit question of whether we have a higher education industry that may be producing too many four year degrees. I don’t know the answer yet for sure but I know it’s worth the conversation.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

That looks good. And with jalapeños ok I see it now.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

Can you tell me the recipe ?that sounds easy and good.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

This is the correct take. I believe this is the most underrated bite in the whole event.

Brian Schatz@schatz.bsky.socialNov 25(source)

I just had dates with skippy 30 minutes ago.

← Newer postsPosts page 19Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(44)

S. 4466 (119th)
A bill to provide a Foreign Service officer career pathway for former United States Agency f…
S. Res. 715 (119th)
A resolution recognizing escalating threats to freedom of the press and freedom of speech wo…
S. Res. 670 (119th)
A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of the 2026 Day of Silence in bringing attentio…
S. 4216 (119th)
A bill to repeal the Executive order entitled "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Arti…
S. Con. Res. 32 (119th)
A concurrent resolution supporting the goals and ideals of International Transgender Day of …

Cosponsored Bills(168)

S. Res. 714 (119th)
A resolution supporting the designation of May 10, 2026, as "National Asian American, Native…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. Res. 720 (119th)
A resolution recognizing the significance of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Is…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4436 (119th)
A bill to nullify certain rules related to foreign assistance.
Joined: 2026-04-29
S. 4407 (119th)
A bill to require the creation of family accounts for children to be able to use artificial …
Joined: 2026-04-28
S. 4330 (119th)
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to revise the treatment of partnership int…
Joined: 2026-04-16

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

772 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-10-15	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-14	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Final passage	NO	YES	✕	Bill Passed (77-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (10-88, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2296 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (14-83, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-10-09	H.J. Res. 106 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 106	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-09	H.J. Res. 106 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-09	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-09	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08	H.J. Res. 105 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 105	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (50-45)
2025-10-08	S.J. Res. 83 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 83	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (48-51)
2025-10-08	S.J. Res. 71 (119th)	Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 71	YES	YES	✓	Joint Resolution Defeated (47-51)
2025-10-08	H.J. Res. 105 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-08	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-08	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-08	H.J. Res. 104 (119th)	Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 104	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-10-07	H.J. Res. 104 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-10-07	S. Res. 412 (119th)	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-06	S. Res. 412 (119th)	End debate	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-10-06	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-42, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-06	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-03	S. Res. 412 (119th)	Resolution S.Res. 412	NO	NO	✓	Resolution Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-01	S. Res. 412 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-01	—	Confirm nominee	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-10-01	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-01	H.R. 5371 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-01	S. 2882 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Bill Defeated (55-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-30	S. 2882 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Bill Defeated (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29	S. 2806 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (37-61, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-29	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-09-29	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-09-19	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (47-43)
2025-09-19	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-45)
2025-09-19	H.R. 5371 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Bill Defeated (44-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-19	S. 2882 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Bill Defeated (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-18	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17	—	Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25	YES	YES	✓	Decision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17	—	Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 16Next →