
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 5
Mary Gay Scanlon
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 316
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Mary Gay Scanlon
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 5
SoupScore
Mary Gay's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 6 sponsored · 21 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I joined 159 of my @HouseDemocrats colleagues to demand accountability for the killing of Renee Good.
The surge of ICE agents to Minneapolis must end, and there must be a third-party investigation of this tragic event to ensure transparency for the American people.
Congressional Republicans’ refusal to extend the ACA tax credit has already compromised access to healthcare for so many Pennsylvanians.
The Senate should pass the House's 3-year extension of the ACA tax credits ASAP!
penncapital-star.com/health-care/...
With everything that has happened this week, you know what didn’t happen?
The release of the Epstein files.
Americans were promised a "golden age."
Instead, this administration's disastrous policies are creating the worst job market for young people since the pandemic.
Even though @houserepublicans.bsky.social refused to extend the ACA tax credits, @housedemocrats.bsky.social got it to the floor and passed it today.
We can still make healthcare more affordable for millions of Americans.
Keep the pressure on!
Congress has to examine ICE's abuses, lack of training, and massive overspending immediately.
Instead of calling for an investigation or demanding accountability, the White House immediately tried to spin this tragedy by calling this young mother a domestic terrorist and claiming she had violently attacked ICE agents, despite eyewitness testimony and video footage.
A masked ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis.
This is wrong - and if you can’t see that, then you don't belong in Congress.
In 5 years, we’ve seen this President and his allies move from urging Americans to commit violence against our government to using government agents to commit violence against Americans: trying to silence anyone who questions this White House or the legality of its dangerous agenda.
This rogue agency is spreading fear and violence, endangering our communities.
It must be reined in.
An ICE agent shot and killed a 37-year-old American citizen in Minneapolis today, further evidence that DHS's lawless and brutal tactics are not making Americans safer.
Statements from the Trump administration seeking to justify the killing are directly contradicted by video & eyewitness testimony.
Issues impacting Americans every day: cost of healthcare, tariffs, and energy costs.
What @houserepublicans.bsky.social is focusing on: showerheads.
The truth matters.
Those who deny the horrific violence and lawlessness that inspired the attack on the Capitol want the American people to forget.
They don’t want you to question their power or hold them accountable.
But we must remember.
Today, the President and his allies are continuing the effort to rewrite or even erase history.
We won't forget what happened that day.
Hundreds of police officers were injured, some losing their lives, and the sitting Vice President, Members of Congress, and staff fled for their lives, as the Capitol became a warzone.
5 years ago, there was a violent attack on the Capitol where a mob interrupted Congress's vote count to certify the 2020 election.
Reposted byCongresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon
We are sure it’s just a coincidence, but today is the statuatory date for the DOJ to explain its redactions in the Epstein file productions.
We have not forgotten, and we won’t let up - regardless of the President’s new unconstitutional actions.
Americans do not want the United States to “run” Venezuela - and neither do Venezuelans. Americans don’t want to pay for this power grab or another forever war. They want a government that works for them, not to enrich the oil industry.
The American people deserve better.
It compromises our constitution, our standing on the world stage, and our government’s obligation to transparency for the American people.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History316 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
316 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 7 / 7