Elizabeth Warren headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Massachusetts
Born
June 22, 1949
Age 77
Phone
(202) 224-4543
Office
311 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts

Elizabeth Warren

Voting Record — 869
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Elizabeth Warren headshot
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 340 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Americans are calling on their leaders to take action on affordability – and housing is the biggest expense for families.   But House Republicans just rejected a bipartisan bill to lower housing costs that received unanimous support in the Senate.   Let’s talk about it.
Ilana Glazer and I chatted about how Netflix is planning to make a dump truck load of money off buying up Warner Bros. Spoiler alert: watch out for fewer jobs and higher prices.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Our troops should be able to fix their own equipment. It's outrageous that swampy corporate lobbyists and the politicians carrying their water stripped our military's "Right to Repair" out of the defense bill.
Right now, greedy defense contractors are blocking our troops from fixing their own equipment. Congress had a bipartisan plan to fix that, but lobbyists stopped it. @deluzio.house.gov and I aren't giving up on this. Our troops should have the right to repair their own stuff.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
@warren.senate.gov and I released a new report showing Trump diverted $2 B from the DoD for his immigration agenda—hurting readiness, morale, and military families. Using troops for political stunts and raiding funds for barracks & training is dangerous. Congress must act.
In just a month, 10,000 people in MA dropped their health insurance. That's 2x more than last year. 10,000 mommas, grandpas, aunts, neighbors, and friends who looked at their bill and said "I can't do this." Because Republicans won’t lift a finger to lower health care costs.
Another way Trump drives up your costs? He sidelined the cops who make sure banks and payday lenders follow the law. Last year those cops ordered more than a billion dollars returned to Americans who were cheated. This year Trump is letting the cheaters keep YOUR money.
Right now, greedy defense contractors are blocking our troops from fixing their own equipment. Congress had a bipartisan plan to fix that, but lobbyists stopped it. @deluzio.house.gov and I aren't giving up on this. Our troops should have the right to repair their own stuff.
This shady deal was BLOCKED. A private equity company tried to abuse the bankruptcy system to slither out of paying what they owe to seniors neglected in its nursing homes. We stayed in the fight and the deal was blocked. Next, we need PE out of health care altogether.
Republicans gave $132 billion in tax breaks to the top 1% in 2027. With that money, we could have extended ACA tax credits for over 20 million people next year and still have $100 billion left over.
Republicans gave $132 billion in tax breaks to the top 1% in 2027.
 
With that money, we could have extended ACA tax credits for over 20 million people next year and still have $100 billion left over.
I've warned that a Warner Bros. merger could mean higher prices. But don't take it from me. The CEO of Disney just said Netflix buying up Warner Bros. could increase Netflix's "pricing leverage" over consumers. Translation: Higher prices for you to watch your favorite shows.
Today was our last chance in Congress to save the Affordable Care Act subsidies that help people afford care before they expire at the end of the year. And what did Republicans do? They voted NO.
BREAKING: The Trump administration took $2 BILLION+ from our military to use on political stunts. This is an insult to our troops. It won’t make our military stronger or Americans safer. Pete Hegseth and Kristi Noem owe taxpayers answers.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
869 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-14S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 98NONOPoint of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2026-01-13S.J. Res. 84 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-01-12H.R. 6938 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-40)
2026-01-08S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98YESYESMotion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47)
2026-01-07S.J. Res. 86 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (43-50)
2026-01-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2026-01-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-01-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-35)
2025-12-18End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-12-18End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2025-12-18End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (58-36)
2025-12-18End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-12-18S. Res. 532 (119th)Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-12-18S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (50-50)
2025-12-17S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (71-29)
2025-12-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (69-27)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-30)
2025-12-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-30)
2025-12-17S. 1071 (119th)Accept House changesNOYESMotion Agreed to (77-20)
2025-12-15S. 1071 (119th)End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-11S. 1071 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (75-22)
2025-12-11S. Res. 532 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOResolution Agreed to (52-47)
2025-12-11S. 3385 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-11S. 3386 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-10S. Res. 532 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-12-10S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-49)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-12-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-12-09Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-12-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-12-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-32)
2025-12-04S. Res. 520 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (43-37, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-04H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-45)
2025-12-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (63-34)
2025-12-03S.J. Res. 91 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (49-47)
2025-12-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-41)
2025-12-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-40)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (60-39)
2025-12-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-36)
2025-12-02Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-12-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-41)
2025-11-20H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (51-43)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 76 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-51)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-11-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-32)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 18Next →