PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Tammy Baldwin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Wisconsin
Born
February 11, 1962
Age 64
Phone
(202) 224-5653
Office
141 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Wisconsin

Tammy Baldwin

Tammy Suzanne Green Baldwin is an American politician and lawyer serving since 2013 as the junior United States senator from Wisconsin. A member of the Democratic Party, she has also served as the secretary of the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017. Baldwin has been the dean of the United States congressional delegation from Wisconsin since 2023, when Representative Ron Kind retired.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 784
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenatorBaldwinFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Tammy Baldwin headshot
Tammy Baldwin
U.S. SenatorDemocratWisconsin
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 269 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 21(source)
Today marks the last stop of my Hands Off Medicaid Tour in Waukesha! 📍 Wisconsinites are scared of Republicans' plan to slash Medicaid so they can fund their tax breaks for people like Elon Musk and sadly, they have good reason to be. I won’t stand for it.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 20(source)
Huge thank you to these Wisconsinites in Racine and everyone who has come out so far to share their stories with me about how Medicaid is a lifeline for them. We are in this fight together.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 20(source)
Kicking off Day #3 of my Hands Off Medicaid Tour in Racine! 📍 Wisconsinites across the state are fired up about Elon Musk and Republicans working to take their health care away and we are not letting up.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 19(source)
My constituents are angry at Elon Musk’s and Republicans’ plan to rip away health care from their loved ones on Medicaid — all so they can pay for new tax breaks for billionaires. I hear them loud and clear, and I am fighting with them. themonroetimes.com/local-news/b...
Baldwin says she shares voters’ anger at cuts
MONROE — As cost-cutting chaos grips Washington and has agencies scrambling nationwide, Wisconsin Senator Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison, reached out to constituents in our part of the state Thursday for a ...
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 19(source)
I’ve been on the road, traveling the state to hear directly from Wisconsinites on Medicaid who stand to lose their health care because of Elon Musk and Republicans’ plan to cut this critical program. I’m not taking my foot off the gas.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 18(source)
Over one million Wisconsinites rely on Medicaid, but they are not just statistics. I’m in Eau Claire with the real people who rely on Medicaid to stay healthy. I’m not going to let Republicans fund their tax break for the rich on the backs of these folks. #MedicaidDayofAction
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 18(source)
In Eau Claire today for Day #2 of my Hands Off Medicaid Tour. 📍 I’ll be talking with Wisconsin families who are standing up against Republican efforts to terminate the health care that keeps them and their families well.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 17(source)
Medicaid is a lifeline for Wisconsinites like the ones here in La Crosse. While Republicans work hard to rip away care from grandparents and kids to fund new tax breaks for billionaires, we have one message for them: Hands off Medicaid.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 17(source)
Today, I am launching my Hands Off Medicaid Tour. Republicans' plan will cut Medicaid to the bone and crush Wisconsinites. I am hitting the road to talk with Wisconsinites and fight back. First stop: La Crosse.📍
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 13(source)
Wisconsin farmers and producers work tirelessly to grow food that feeds hungry children and stocks our local food pantries. Now, Elon Musk and President Trump are slashing that program and leaving our farmers out to dry and some kids without food. www.wpr.org/news/usda-cu...
USDA cuts program that brought locally-grown food to schools, pantries
In an email to WPR, a USDA spokesperson called the initiatives "pandemic-era" programs with "no plan for longevity," and said the department was returning to "long-term, fiscally responsible initiativ...
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 12(source)
Donald Trump and Elon Musk are firing the workers who ensure Pell Grants, student loans, and federal funding for our schools get out the door all so they can give tax breaks to big corporations. This isn’t efficiency—this will hurt Wisconsin kids. www.newsweek.com/doe-educatio...
How student loans will be impacted by Department of Education mass layoffs
The Department of Education announced it was laying off employees as part of an effort to halve the agency's staff.
Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govMar 6(source)
President Trump and Republicans are trading children’s education for billionaire tax breaks. Abolishing the Department of Education would be devastating for parents, teachers, and schools. I will fight back in every way I can. www.npr.org/2025/03/05/n...
Trump prepares order dismantling the Education Department
The draft executive action, obtained by NPR, acknowledges that the department and its signature responsibilities were created by Congress and cannot legally be altered without congressional approval.
← Newer postsPosts page 28Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
784 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-32)
2025-12-04S. Res. 520 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (43-37, 3/5 majority required)
2025-12-04H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (49-45)
2025-12-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-34)
2025-12-03S.J. Res. 91 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (49-47)
2025-12-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-41)
2025-12-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-40)
2025-12-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (60-39)
2025-12-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-36)
2025-12-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-12-01—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-41)
2025-11-20H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-43)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 76 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-51)
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-11-19—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-11-18—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (65-32)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Bill Passed (60-40)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (60-40)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionNOYES✕Motion to Table Agreed to (76-24)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Failed (47-53)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Failed (47-53)
2025-11-10H.R. 5371 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40)
2025-11-09H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (60-40, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-07S. 3012 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (53-43, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-06S.J. Res. 90 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 90YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-51)
2025-11-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (57-43)
2025-11-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-11-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-11-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-11-04H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-44, 3/5 majority required)
2025-11-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-10-30—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-10-30S.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-10-30S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-45)
2025-10-29S.J. Res. 77 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (50-46)
2025-10-29S.J. Res. 69 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (25-72)
2025-10-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-10-29S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-10-28S.J. Res. 81 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-10-28—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-10-28—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-47)
2025-10-28—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-10-28H.R. 5371 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-10-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (58-40)
2025-10-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-10-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-10-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-45)
2025-10-23S. 3012 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 16Next →