Judy Chu headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 28
Born
July 7, 1953
Age 72
Phone
(202) 225-5464
Office
2423 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 28

Judy Chu

Judy May Chu is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 28th congressional district. A member of the Democratic Party, she has held a seat in Congress since 2009, representing California's 32nd congressional district until redistricting. Chu is the first Chinese American woman elected to Congress.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 498
Yes41%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 28

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Judy Chu headshot
Judy Chu
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 28
SoupScore
Judy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 255 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The Rose family is one of the 6,000 households that lost their home in the Eaton Fire. Yet even in the face of destruction, their resilience never diminished.
As the threat of wildfires continues to grow, I remain committed to advancing comprehensive training and securing the resources our first responders need to keep us safe.
In 2025, our community was devastated by the Eaton Fire, when we tragically lost 19 of our neighbors. If it weren't for our courageous firefighters, we would’ve lost even more.
Today, we honor the firefighters who gave their lives and those who continue to serve. Every day, these brave individuals put their lives at risk to keep our communities safe.   We will continue to protect firefighters’ wages, benefits, health, and safety in the line of duty.🚒
Happy Jewish American Heritage Month! Let’s recognize the lasting impact of Jewish Americans, whose resilience, creativity, and leadership continue to shape and strengthen our country, and renew our commitment to fighting the spread of antisemitism.
I am relieved that access to mifepristone has been rightfully restored. As this case proceeds, let's be clear: Mifepristone was safe and effective when first approved by the FDA over 25 years ago, and it has been for the millions of people who have used it since.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court restores access to abortion pill mifepristone through telehealth, mail and pharmacies.
Decades of use and over 100 peer reviewed studies have repeatedly proven that mifepristone is safe & effective. There is no medical or scientific reason for adding more restrictions. This ruling is not about safety. It is about control. We will fight this every step of the way.
The anti-abortion movement is one step closer to their ultimate goal of ending abortion access nationwide—even in states like California where abortion is legal. We will not let this stand.
BREAKING: A federal appeals court has blocked mailing prescriptions to mifepristone, restricting access to one of the most common means of abortion.
That’s why I’m proud to introduce the Language Access Board Act with @meng.house.gov, @vargas.house.gov, and @padilla.senate.gov to fight back against these hateful policies so that language access protections are enforced.
Our immigrant communities depend on translation support to apply for a disaster loan, pay their taxes, or start a small business. But Trump’s English-only policies have stripped these resources away in a racist attempt to shut people out of the very services their tax dollars fund.
That’s why I joined @reptedlieu.bsky.social in leading a letter to DHS and ICE leadership, demanding full transparency and accountability to ensure tragedies like this never happen again. Adelanto must shut down.
Jose Guadalupe Ramos-Solano should still be alive today. Jose is the fourth person to die in Adelanto's custody since Trump took office. This is a pattern that must end immediately.
This is a month to celebrate the history and countless contributions of our community. It's also a reminder to uplift AANHPI voices not just in May, but every single day of the year.
As the first Chinese American Congresswoman and Chair Emerita of @capac.house.gov, I am so proud to represent such a diverse community in the San Gabriel Valley, including Monterey Park, the first suburban Chinatown in the United States.
This bill would reverse this discriminatory policy and ensure that lawfully present immigrants can continue building their businesses and serving Americans on Main Street and beyond.
I'm proud to co-sponsor the Investing in the American Dream Act, introduced by @velazquez.house.gov and @markey.senate.gov. Trump blocked lawfully present immigrants from accessing SBA-backed loans, cutting off capital for small businesses and harming our entire economy.
As a Chair Emerita of @capac.house.gov, I will continue to recognize the history of Black April and acknowledge the numerous ways the Vietnamese community has enriched our nation.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
498 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-21H. Con. Res. 58 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 10Next →