Gilbert Ray Cisneros headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 31
Born
February 12, 1971
Age 55
Phone
(202) 225-5256
Office
2463 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 31

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.

Gilbert Ray Cisneros Jr. is an American politician and former naval officer serving as the U.S. representative for California's 31st congressional district since 2025. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously served as Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness in the Biden administration and was the U.S. representative for California's 39th congressional district from 2019 to 2021.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 498
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 31

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gilbert Ray Cisneros headshot
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 31
SoupScore
Gilbert Ray's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 66 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Over the weekend, I joined West Covina and Monrovia at their Lunar New Year celebrations. I got to see traditional demonstrations from Covina Martial Arts and the Field Elementary School Lion Dance Team, the perfect way to ring in a new year!
Great to touch base with El Monte Union High School District Trustee Florencio Briones. I am committed to supporting robust, sustained federal investments in our students, educators, and schools.
I welcomed University of La Verne President Risa Dickson to my office to discuss protecting and expanding the Pell Grant and what we can do to  protect our students and workforce. Thanks for your continued investment in our students and our community.
With these grants, our cities will finally get to see their parks and recreation centers get upgrades, bring in new technology for public safety systems, and make long overdue investments in water, transportation, and infrastructure.
I refuse to stand by while our communities are attacked by ICE at the direction of Trump and Kristi Noem. Today, I addressed a crowd of hundreds outside ICE HQ to demand Kristi Noem’s immediate impeachment for the safety and security of us all.
February is Black History Month. This month and every month, it is important to celebrate and honor our Black community, celebrate their stories, and commit ourselves to advancing justice and equality for all.
I refuse to standby while our communities are under attack by ICE at the direction of Trump and Kristi Noem. Americans across our country are being put in danger from these lawless federal agents. We must hold this administration accountable. Impeach Noem.
This year, California launched a new program to protect your data and privacy. The Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP) is a free and quick method to reduce spam and tell data brokers to delete and not sell your personal information. Register or find more information at privacy.ca.gov/drop.
Trump and Kristi Noem say immigration enforcement focuses on violent criminals. The American people aren’t falling for the lies. We see Noem’s DHS targeting and profiling American citizens. She must be impeached.
On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, we honor the lives of the 6 million Jewish victims of the Holocaust. The atrocities of the Holocaust left a horrific mark in our history and we must vow to fight against antisemitism and hatred. Never again.
ICE cannot continue to abuse, harm, and kill people in our streets. I am working with my colleagues through legislation and congressional oversight to hold ICE accountable and limit their excessive use of force. We need to put an end to the violence against our neighbors and communities.
Secretary Kristi Noem’s willful misconduct is violating the constitution and federal law and putting every single one of us in danger. Kristi Noem must be impeached—immediately—for the safety and security of America.
Eight additional Democrats sign on to an impeachment resolution against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in the wake of the killing of Alex Pretti, bringing the total number of co-sponsors to 120, according to a spokesperson.
While ICE is out of control and operating without accountability, all of us are in danger. The Department of Homeland Security is supposed to protect the American people. But as long as Kristi Noem remains in charge, it is the biggest threat against the American people.
Another person has been shot in Minneapolis by federal officers. What we need now is sympathy for the victim, an investigation into what happened, and an end to violence in our streets. ICE and CBP must end their operations and leave MN and our communities, NOW.
It was never about targeting criminals, keeping communities safe, or getting justice for victims. It has always been about harassing minorities and inciting violence.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
498 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-21H. Con. Res. 58 (119th)Approve resolutionYESNOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 1949 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferNOYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 10Next →