I met with the UAW Local 2301, based in Elkridge, and other Maryland UAW members to discuss legislative priorities, including strengthening health and safety protections, supporting paid family leave, protecting pensions, and more.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maryland District 3
Sarah Elfreth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 498
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sarah Elfreth
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaryland District 3
SoupScore
Sarah's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Maryland is home to more than 300,000 union workers who represent nearly every major part of our workforce from health care professionals and teachers to toolmakers and truck drivers.
➡️ Despite Democrats pushing for real reforms to ICE, DHS funding is set to expire today
The good, the bad, and the ugly. Here's your weekly update from Washington:
➡️ I filed a new bipartisan bill to reduce domestic violence-related homicides and save lives
➡️ The SAVE Act came back to the floor and is worse than before
A DHS shutdown also impacts FEMA’s disaster aid response, TSA’s work, Coast Guard missions, and so much more. That is why I support @delauro.house.gov’s legislation to make sure these hardworking federal workers are paid, without sending another penny to ICE or CBP.
I have been clear that as long as the President continues to weaponize ICE, we cannot fund this lawless agency. Today, DHS funding expires despite earnest, commonsense reforms proposed by Democrats to put clear guardrails on ICE.
thehill.com/homenews/hou...
This week, I joined University of Albany President Dr. Havidán Rodríguez for the 2026 Campus Compact Civic Education Summit at George Washington University to share my path to public service and why higher education is crucial to fostering lifelong civic engagement.
I know firsthand the importance of higher education in shaping the next generation of civic leaders through voting, internships, opportunities to engage in the legislative process, and more.
I was inspired to public service as a college student, first by advocating in Annapolis for greater voting access at Towson University and later serving on the University System of Maryland Board of Regents.
Earlier this week, I spoke at the House Rules Committee in opposition to this legislation, and I voted no on the House floor.
Yet House Republicans have proposed legislation that would exempt billion-dollar corporations like Meta from commonsense environmental regulations that require special use permits and fair market value fees to build undersea cables.
Our National Marine Sanctuaries belong to every American – not just Silicon Valley executives.. They sustain tens of thousands of local jobs and small businesses, protecting our nation’s most sensitive ecological areas and driving $8 billion in economic activity.
I’m proud to introduce bipartisan legislation that will take what we developed and learned in Maryland and help states across the country reduce domestic violence-related homicides and save lives.
The Lethality Assessment Program, developed by the Maryland Network Against Domestic Violence, is one of the best tools that law enforcement and community partners have to identify high-danger situations.
Far too often, we miss the signs leading up to intimate partner homicide – but Maryland has been a leader in creating an evidence-based program to recognize the risks and patterns.
We were able to secure major wins for Fort Meade in last year’s NDAA, and I’m looking forward to working closely throughout this year’s NDAA process and beyond to deliver real solutions for our servicemembers who have sacrificed so much for this country.
After speaking at Ft Meade Alliance’s breakfast, I sat down with the Garrison Commander Colonel, Deputy Garrison Commander, Command Sergeant Major, & other members of leadership to discuss improving on-base infrastructure, streamlining personnel hiring, & improving life for servicemembers.
With DHS funding set to expire at the end of the week, House Democrats have proposed real, commonsense reforms to ICE – including ensuring agents wear body cameras, requiring warrants for ICE to enter private property, prohibiting agents from entering schools, churches, and more.
President Trump promised that he would only go after “the worst of the worst” with his immigration policies, yet 95% of those detained by ICE have no criminal record.
Their journey sends a powerful message of faith, compassion, and persistence, especially during these difficult times. Thank you for sharing your peace and light with all of us.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History498 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
498 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.